Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Rectal sparing in modified posterior exenteration: description of the technique in 10 steps
  1. Navid Mokarram Dorri1,
  2. Guillaume Blache1,
  3. Jonathan Garnier1,
  4. Gilles Houvenaeghel1,2,
  5. Houssein El Hajj1 and
  6. Eric Lambaudie1,2
    1. 1Surgical Oncology Department, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
    2. 2Université Aix Marseille, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
    1. Correspondence to Dr Navid Mokarram Dorri, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France; mokarramdorrin{at}ipc.unicancer.fr

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Background

    To achieve complete cytoreduction in ovarian carcinoma, rectal resection may be necessary in the case of gastrointestinal tract involvement.1 Posterior resection surgeries were described by Eiseinkopt and Bristow who modified Hudson’s pelvic peritonectomy.2

    The concept of digestive sparing has been developed for several years. We propose a modified surgical approach of posterior resection by combining three principles (Hudson-type dissection, pushed Douglasectomy, and first stapling of the rectum) to optimize rectal sparing.3 4

    Method

    Video 1 shows an 10-steps ‘en bloc’ pelvic peritonectomy combined with digestive resection, illustrating the first stapling of the rectum. We associated other digestive resection during this procedure not present in Video 1 (peritonectomy of the right diaphragmatic dome, mesentery and mesocolon). The surgery was performed by a senior surgeon and an assistant from the department.

    Video 1 ‘En bloc’ pelvic resection: section of anterior and lateral part of vagina and beginning of the Douglasectomy. (a) Vagina. (b) Right ureter. (c) Cervix. (d) Mesorectum.

    Results

    The surgical procedure is divided into 10 steps:

    Step 1: Supra-pelvic and intra-peritoneal approach

    Step 2: Pelvic and retro-peritoneal approach

    Step 3: Uterine vessel ligature

    Step 4 : Ureterolysis

    Step 5 : Pre-vesical peritonectomy

    Step 6: Para-rectal space dissection

    Step 7: ‘Hanging’ en bloc specimen

    Step 8: Retrograde dissection of rectovaginal septum and Douglas pouch dissection

    Step 9: First rectal stapling

    Step 10: Proximal bowel division

    Conclusions

    In our experience, the first section of the rectum is always feasible if the three principles are combined (Hudson-type dissection, advanced Douglasectomy, and first stapling of the rectum). The advantages of rectal sparing are that it allows an anastomosis to be made on the upper rectum, avoids lowering the left colonic angle, makes it very easy to combine other digestive resections ‘en bloc’, and facilitates repeat rectal resections in the case of recurrence. Standardization of this procedure will help young surgeons to learn the methodology and better grasp the steps involved.

    Ethics statements

    Patient consent for publication

    Ethics approval

    Not applicable.

    Acknowledgments

    Illustrations by Ludovic Chaix.

    References

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @Blache Guillaume, @housseinelhajj3

    • Contributors NMD: Conceptualization, video editing, surgery, video recording, voice recording, writing - original draft. GB: Conceptualization, video editing, surgery, video recording, supervision, writing - original draft. JG, GH, HEH: Conceptualization. EL: Conceptualization, supervision. EL critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final draft.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.