Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Prognostic role of transcription factor ARID1A in patients with endometrial cancer of no specific molecular profile (NSMP) subtype
  1. Arina Onoprienko1,
  2. Gerda Hofstetter2,
  3. Leonhard Muellauer2,
  4. Tim Dorittke1,
  5. Stephan Polterauer1,
  6. Christoph Grimm1 and
  7. Thomas Bartl1,3
    1. 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    2. 2Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    3. 3Translational Gynecology Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    1. Correspondence to Dr Christoph Grimm, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, Austria; christoph.grimm{at}meduniwien.ac.at

    Abstract

    Objective As more than 50% of newly diagnosed endometrial cancers remain classified as ‘no specific molecular subtype’ (NSMP) due to a lack of established biomarkers to further improve molecular subtyping, this study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of ARID1A in endometrial cancers of NSMP subtype.

    Methods Prospectively collected molecular profiling data of all consecutive patients with endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgery at our department between August 2017 and June 2022 and for whom both molecular profiling and clinical follow-up data were available were retrospectively evaluated. Tumor specimens were evaluated by combined mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry and targeted next-generation hotspot sequencing. ARID1A mutational status, as defined by full-length gene sequencing, was matched with risk of recurrence, progression-free and disease-specific survival within the NSMP cohort.

    Results A total of 127 patients with endometrial cancer were included. Among 72 patients with tumors of NSMP subtype (56.7%), ARID1A mutations were identified in 24 cases (33.3%). ARID1A mutations were significantly associated with a higher risk of recurrence (37.5% vs 12.5%, OR 4.20, 95% CI 1.28 to 13.80, p=0.018) and impaired progression-free survival (HR 3.96, 95% CI 1.41 to 11.15, p=0.009), but not with disease-specific survival. The results for both risk of recurrence (OR 3.70, 95% CI 1.04 to 13.13, p=0.043) and progression-free survival (HR 3.19, 95% CI 1.10 to 9.25, p=0.033) were confirmed in multivariable analysis compared with advanced tumor stage International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2009) (FIGO ≥III) and impaired Eastern Clinical Oncology Group performance status (ECOG ≥1).

    Conclusion ARID1A appears to identify patients with endometrial cancer of NSMP subtypes with a higher risk of recurrence and could be used as a future prognostic biomarker. After clinical validation, ARID1A assessment could help to further sub-classify selected endometrial cancers and improve personalized treatment strategies.

    • Endometrium

    Data availability statement

    Data are available upon reasonable request. Raw data were generated at the Medical University of Vienna. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Data availability statement

    Data are available upon reasonable request. Raw data were generated at the Medical University of Vienna. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors Conceptualization: AO, TB and CG. Data curation: AO, TD and GH. Formal analysis: AO, TB, SP and LM. Investigation: TD, GH. Methodology: AO and TB. Project administration: CG. Resources: SP, CG, GH and LM. Software: AO and TB. Supervision: CG. Validation: CG, SP and GH. Visualization: AO and TB. Writing—original draft preparation: AO and TB. Writing—review and editing: GH and CG. Guarantor for overall content: AO.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.