Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Factors Affecting Short-term Mortality in Women With Ovarian, Tubal, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer: Population-Based Cohort Analysis of English National Cancer Registration Data
  1. Matthew Barclay, MMath*,
  2. Carolynn Gildea, MSc*,
  3. Jason Poole, MSc*,
  4. Lynn Hirschowitz, MBBCh,
  5. Usha Menon, MD and
  6. Andrew Nordin, MBBS§
  1. *National Cancer Intelligence Network, Public Health England, Sheffield;
  2. Department of Cellular Pathology, Birmingham Women’s NHS Trust, Birmingham;
  3. Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Women’s Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women’s Health, London; and
  4. §East Kent Gynaecological Centre, Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital, Margate, United Kingdom.
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Carolynn Gildea, MSc, National Cancer Intelligence Network, Public Health England, 5 Old Fulwood Rd, Sheffield S10 3TG, United Kingdom. E-mail: carolynn.gildea@phe.gov.uk.

Abstract

Objective International studies show lower survival rates in the United Kingdom than other countries with comparable health care systems. We report on factors associated with excess mortality in the first year after diagnosis of primary invasive epithelial ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancer.

Methods Routinely collected national data were used for patients diagnosed in England in 2008 to 2010. A multivariate Poisson model was used to model excess mortality in 3 periods covering the first year after diagnosis, adjusting for various factors including age at diagnosis, route to diagnosis, tumor stage, tumor morphology, and treatment received.

Results Of 14,827 women diagnosed as having ovarian cancer, 5296 (36%) died in the first year, with 1673 deaths in the first month after diagnosis. Age older than 70 years, diagnosis after an emergency presentation or by an unknown route, and unspecified or unclassified epithelial morphologies were strongly and independently associated with excess mortality in the first year after diagnosis. Of the 2100 (14%) women who fulfilled all 3 criteria, 1553 (74%) did not receive any treatment and 1774 (85%) died in the first year after diagnosis. In contrast, only 193 (4%) of the 4414 women without any of these characteristics did not receive any treatment, and only 427 (9%) died in the first year after diagnosis.

Conclusions Although our results are based on data from England, they are likely to have implications for cancer care pathways worldwide because most of the identified factors are not specific to the UK health care system. Our results suggest the need to increase symptom awareness, promote timely general practitioner referral, and optimize diagnostic and early treatment pathways within secondary care to increase access to treatment for women with advanced-stage invasive epithelial ovarian, tubal, and primary peritoneal cancer. This process should be pursued alongside continued efforts to develop primary prevention and screening strategies.

  • Ovarian
  • Tubal
  • Primary peritoneal
  • Mortality
  • England

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • U.M. was supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre.

  • Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citation appears in the printed text and is provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.ijgc.net).