Elsevier

Gynecologic Oncology

Volume 124, Issue 1, January 2012, Pages 31-35
Gynecologic Oncology

Lymphovascular space invasion is an independent risk factor for nodal disease and poor outcomes in endometrioid endometrial cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Adjuvant radiotherapy improves local control but not survival in women with endometrial cancer. This benefit was shown in staged patients with “high intermediate risk” (HIR) disease. Other studies have challenged the need for systematic staging including lymphadenectomy. We sought to determine whether LVSI alone or in combination with other histologic factors predicts lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma who had confirmed presence/absence of LVSI and clinicopathologic data necessary to identify HIR criteria. Kaplan–Meier curves were generated and univariate and multivariate analyses performed as appropriate.

Results

We identified 757 eligible patients and 628 underwent systematic lymphadenectomy for staging purposes. In the surgically staged group, 242 (38%) patients met uterine HIR criteria and 196 (31%) had LVSI. Both HIR and LVSI were significantly associated with LN metastasis. Among the HIR positive group, 59 had LN metastasis (OR 4.46, 95% CI 2.72–7.32, P < 0.0001). Sixty-six LVSI positive patients had nodal metastasis (OR 11.04, 95% CI 6.39–19.07, P < 0.0001). The NPV of LVSI and HIR negative specimens was 95.6% and 93.4% respectively. In multivariate analysis, PFS and OS were significantly reduced in both LVSI positive (P < 0.0001) and HIR patients (P < 0.0001) when compared to patients who were LVSI and HIR negative.

Conclusions

HIR status and LVSI are highly associated with LN metastasis. These features are useful in assessing risk of metastatic disease and may serve as a surrogate for prediction of extrauterine disease.

Highlights

► LVSI is associated with nodal metastasis and poor survival in endometrial cancer. ► The NPV of 95% with LVSI-negative tumors may exclude nodal disease. ► LVSI and other histological makers may be used as surrogates for treatment planning.

Introduction

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States with 43,000 new cases and 7900 deaths in 2010 alone [1]. Eighty percent of women present at an early stage and thus overall 5-year survival rates approach 90–97% [2], [3]. Systematic surgical staging including lymph node (LN) evaluation remains an important prognostic tool in women with endometrial cancer. Recently however, two large European studies have called into question the therapeutic value of routine lymph node sampling in patients afflicted with this disease. These studies evaluated 1914 patients and found that survival was not different between patients who received lymphadenectomy and those who only underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy and removal of adnexae alone [4], [5]. There is however, extensive controversy surrounding these results with regards to study design and inclusion criteria.

In the near future, uterine histopathologic features may become increasingly important and used as a surrogate risk marker and determinant of adjuvant therapy for patients with high risk disease. Several trials including PORTEC-1 and GOG protocol 99 have established factors such as age, grade, and depth of myometrial invasion as characteristics associated with increased risk for recurrence [2], [6]. Interestingly, these studies did not examine the association of these markers with lymph node metastasis, a significant predictor of outcome. LVSI in particular has been previously shown in a few, small scale studies to be a biomarker for both nodal disease and recurrence but the use of this finding remains controversial [7], [8]. We hypothesized that LVSI may independently serve as a predictor of nodal disease in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer in comparison to patients who meet other high risk criteria. The secondary aims of this study are the impact that LVSI has on overall and progression free survival in a cohort of nearly 800 patients.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this retrospective study through the Human Research and Protection Office (HRPO). Our institution maintains a large database of prospectively gathered clinicopathologic data on patients treated for endometrial cancer. The current study included patients diagnosed with endometrioid endometrial cancer over a 16-year period (1991–2007). This interval was chosen to allow for suitable follow-up for outcomes. Inclusion criteria were all women

Results

A total of 1083 patients were enrolled during the study period. Of these 143 were excluded due to lack of outcome data, 173 due to non-endometrioid histology and 10 due to the presence of a non-melanoma skin cancer, leaving a total of 757 for primary evaluation. One hundred twenty-nine patients were excluded from analysis of LN metastasis because of lack or inadequate lymphadenectomy (reasons included clinically apparent advanced disease, large body-mass index (BMI) and/or technical inability

Discussion

In the current study, we have shown that LVSI appears to be highly predictive of nodal disease in endometrial cancer. Further, LVSI was an independent predictor of both decreased overall and progression free survival. Previous studies evaluating LVSI have shown mixed results; Rasool et al. examined 147 patients with endometrial cancer and found LVSI not to be predictive of recurrence or poor outcomes where as Gaducci et al. found it to be associated with distant, hematogenous failures [10], [11]

Conflict of interest statement

The authors disclose no potential conflict of interest with regards to this work.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (173)

View all citing articles on Scopus

Funding: Supported by RO1 CA71754 (P.J.G.) and Barnes-Jewish Foundation00161-0806 (P.J.G.). The Siteman Cancer Center is supported by NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA91842.

View full text