Lymphovascular space invasion is an independent risk factor for nodal disease and poor outcomes in endometrioid endometrial cancer☆
Highlights
► LVSI is associated with nodal metastasis and poor survival in endometrial cancer. ► The NPV of 95% with LVSI-negative tumors may exclude nodal disease. ► LVSI and other histological makers may be used as surrogates for treatment planning.
Introduction
Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States with 43,000 new cases and 7900 deaths in 2010 alone [1]. Eighty percent of women present at an early stage and thus overall 5-year survival rates approach 90–97% [2], [3]. Systematic surgical staging including lymph node (LN) evaluation remains an important prognostic tool in women with endometrial cancer. Recently however, two large European studies have called into question the therapeutic value of routine lymph node sampling in patients afflicted with this disease. These studies evaluated 1914 patients and found that survival was not different between patients who received lymphadenectomy and those who only underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy and removal of adnexae alone [4], [5]. There is however, extensive controversy surrounding these results with regards to study design and inclusion criteria.
In the near future, uterine histopathologic features may become increasingly important and used as a surrogate risk marker and determinant of adjuvant therapy for patients with high risk disease. Several trials including PORTEC-1 and GOG protocol 99 have established factors such as age, grade, and depth of myometrial invasion as characteristics associated with increased risk for recurrence [2], [6]. Interestingly, these studies did not examine the association of these markers with lymph node metastasis, a significant predictor of outcome. LVSI in particular has been previously shown in a few, small scale studies to be a biomarker for both nodal disease and recurrence but the use of this finding remains controversial [7], [8]. We hypothesized that LVSI may independently serve as a predictor of nodal disease in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer in comparison to patients who meet other high risk criteria. The secondary aims of this study are the impact that LVSI has on overall and progression free survival in a cohort of nearly 800 patients.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this retrospective study through the Human Research and Protection Office (HRPO). Our institution maintains a large database of prospectively gathered clinicopathologic data on patients treated for endometrial cancer. The current study included patients diagnosed with endometrioid endometrial cancer over a 16-year period (1991–2007). This interval was chosen to allow for suitable follow-up for outcomes. Inclusion criteria were all women
Results
A total of 1083 patients were enrolled during the study period. Of these 143 were excluded due to lack of outcome data, 173 due to non-endometrioid histology and 10 due to the presence of a non-melanoma skin cancer, leaving a total of 757 for primary evaluation. One hundred twenty-nine patients were excluded from analysis of LN metastasis because of lack or inadequate lymphadenectomy (reasons included clinically apparent advanced disease, large body-mass index (BMI) and/or technical inability
Discussion
In the current study, we have shown that LVSI appears to be highly predictive of nodal disease in endometrial cancer. Further, LVSI was an independent predictor of both decreased overall and progression free survival. Previous studies evaluating LVSI have shown mixed results; Rasool et al. examined 147 patients with endometrial cancer and found LVSI not to be predictive of recurrence or poor outcomes where as Gaducci et al. found it to be associated with distant, hematogenous failures [10], [11]
Conflict of interest statement
The authors disclose no potential conflict of interest with regards to this work.
References (19)
- et al.
Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus surgery alone for patients with stage 1 endometrial carcinoma: multicenter randomized trial. PORTEC study group. Post operative radiation Therapy in Endometrial Cancer
Lancet
(2000) - et al.
Lymphovascular space involvement: an independent prognostic factor in endometrial cancer
Gynecol Oncol
(2005) - et al.
Stage 1, grade 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: an analysis of clinical outcomes and patterns of recurrence
Gynecol Oncol
(2010) - et al.
Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: survival comparisons of patients with and without pelvic node sampling
Gynecol Oncol
(1995) - et al.
Cancer statistics, 2010
CA Cancer J Clin
(2010) - et al.
SEER Survival Monograph: Cancer Survival Among Adults
U.S. SEER Program
(1988–2001) - et al.
Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs no lymphadenectomy in early stage endometrial carcinoma: a randomized clinical trial
J Natl Cancer Inst
(2008) - et al.
Efficacy of systemic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early stage endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomized controlled trial
Lancet
(2009) - et al.
A phase III trial of surgery with or without adjunctive external pelvic radiation therapy in intermediate risk endometrial adenocarcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study
Gynecol Oncol
(2004)
Cited by (173)
2023 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: The evolution of the revolution
2024, Gynecologic OncologyResearch on intrauterine manipulators for endometrial cancer: attention to study-level characteristics
2024, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyRisk factors for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in non-endometrioid endometrial cancer
2024, European Journal of Surgical OncologyUtility of the revised FIGO2023 staging with molecular classification in endometrial cancer
2023, Gynecologic Oncology
- ☆
Funding: Supported by RO1 CA71754 (P.J.G.) and Barnes-Jewish Foundation00161-0806 (P.J.G.). The Siteman Cancer Center is supported by NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA91842.