Elsevier

Gynecologic Oncology

Volume 122, Issue 3, September 2011, Pages 495-500
Gynecologic Oncology

Phase II trial of cetuximab in the treatment of persistent or recurrent squamous or non-squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.040Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) conducted a phase II trial to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab, in persistent or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix.

Patients and methods

Eligible patients had cervical cancer, measurable disease, and GOG performance status ≤ 2. Treatment consisted of cetuximab 400 mg/m2 initial dose followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly until disease progression or prohibitive toxicity. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months and response. The study used a 2-stage group sequential design.

Results

Thirty-eight patients were entered with 3 exclusions, leaving 35 evaluable for analysis. Thirty-one patients (88.6%) received prior radiation as well as either 1 (n = 25, 71.4%) or 2 (n = 10) prior cytotoxic regimens. Twenty-four patients (68.6%) had a squamous cell carcinoma. Grade 3 adverse events possibly related to cetuximab included dermatologic (n = 5), GI (n = 4), anemia (n = 2), constitutional (n = 3), infection (n = 2), vascular (n = 2), pain (n = 2), and pulmonary, neurological, vomiting and metabolic (n = 1 each). No clinical responses were detected. Five patients (14.3%; two-sided 90% CI, 5.8% to 30%) survived without progression for at least 6 months. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) times were 1.97 and 6.7 months, respectively. In this study, all patients with PFS at 6 months harbored tumors with squamous cell histology.

Conclusion

Cetuximab is well tolerated but has limited activity in this population. Cetuximab activity may be limited to patients with squamous cell histology.

Research highlights

► The GOG evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of cetuximab in cervical cancer. ► Cetuximab is well tolerated but has limited activity in persistent/recurrent disease. ► Cetuximab activity may be limited to cervical cancer with squamous cell histology.

Introduction

Cervical cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death among women worldwide and remains an important health problem for women especially in underserved and minority groups in the Unites States [1]. Although cervical cancer can be cured by radical surgery or radiotherapy with equal effectiveness, pelvic chemo-radiation represents the standard therapy for the treatment of locally advanced disease [2]. Despite technological advances, however, up to 35% of patients overall will develop persistent/recurrent/metastatic disease. Platinum-based chemotherapy represents the gold standard therapy for the treatment of cervical cancer patients who have not responded to primary therapy or have recurrent disease no longer amenable to control with surgery and/or radiation therapy. Unfortunately, most responses to chemotherapy are partial and of short duration, and the most effective treatment of patients with progressive disease on platinum-based chemotherapy has yet to be defined.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; HER1/erbB-1) has recently been identified as a target for cancer therapy in multiple human tumors [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. On endogenous ligand binding, EGFR activation occurs, with receptor homo- or heterodimerization and autophosphorylation of the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain [9], [10]. Subsequently, a complex network of signal transduction pathways is induced, which plays a key role in regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, motility, invasion, and angiogenesis [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. EGFR is expressed in a variety of human malignancies and its high level of expression has been previously correlated with poor patient prognosis and resistance to treatment in many tumor entities including cervical carcinoma [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18].

Cetuximab (C225) is a human/murine chimeric monoclonal antibody formed by cloning the heavy and light chains of the murine antibody (M225) and adapting them for expression with the constant regions of the human immunoglobulin kappa light chain and gamma 1 heavy chain [4], [6], [19]. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that cetuximab binds to the EGFR with high affinity and is able to compete with EGF and TGFα binding, thereby inhibiting subsequent receptor activation and signaling [20], [21]. In addition, binding of cetuximab to EGFR induces receptor dimerization, internalization and receptor down regulation [22], [23]. These processes may consequently lead to several effects such as cell-cycle arrest via upregulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27KIP1, and potentiation of apoptosis [24], [25]. Other effects include inhibition of tumor production of VEGF leading to reduced tumor microvessel density and inhibition of invasion and metastases by inhibiting matrix metalloproteinases [26], [27].

Clinical studies of cetuximab either alone or in combination with cytotoxic agents have demonstrated efficacy in patients with chemotherapy-refractory head and neck or colorectal cancer [28], [29], [30], [31], [32]. In patients with irinotecan-refractory advanced colorectal cancer, treatment with cetuximab either as a single agent or in combination with irinotecan resulted in overall remission rates of 10.8% (95% CI, 5.7% to 18.1%) and 22.9% (95% CI, 17.5% to 29.1%), respectively [30], [31]. Similar results have been reported for patients with platinum-refractory head and neck cancer or non-small-cell lung cancer with cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy [32].

Cervical cancer patients with metastatic/recurrent disease not amenable to radical local excision or regional radiation and who have progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy have limited therapeutic options. The GOG conducted a phase II trial of single-agent cetuximab in patients with persistent or recurrent squamous or non-squamous cervical carcinoma. The primary endpoints of this study were the frequency of patients with tumor responses or who survived progression-free for at least 6 months (PFS at 6 months). The secondary objectives were to estimate the distribution of overall survival (OS), the distribution of PFS, the duration of objective response, and the frequency and severity of adverse events.

Section snippets

Eligibility

Eligibility criteria included patients with persistent or recurrent squamous and non-squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix that was measurable by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST); one or two prior cytotoxic regimens, not including prior cisplatin-based chemotherapy concomitantly administered with primary pelvic radiation; GOG performance status (PS) of 0 or 1, with PS level 2 allowed in patients having received only one prior cytotoxic regimen; and adequate hematologic

Patient characteristics

From June 2007 through July 2009, 38 patients were enrolled, of whom 3 were excluded (1 for inappropriate prior therapy, 1 because required tests were not performed, and 1 for no documentation of treatment with cetuximab). Thus, the study sample consisted of 35 patients; 26 patients (74.3%) were Caucasian, 5 patients (14.3%) were African-American, 2 patients (5.7%) were Asian and 2 (5.7%) were Hispanic. Patient characteristics of the study group are listed in Table 1.

A total of 103 cycles of

Discussion

The management of cervical cancer no longer amenable to control with surgery or radiation therapy has only minimally improved with the advent of modern chemotherapy. The median survival rate for these patients when treated with current systemic cisplatin combination regimens is only 9 to 10 months [35], [36]. Thus, the development of innovative, effective therapies against advanced/recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer refractory to standard salvage treatment remains a high priority.

One class of

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Cecelia H. Boardman is on the Speaker's Bureau for Glaso-Smith-Kline and Merck. All other co-authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Acknowledgment

We thank Sandra Dascomb, Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Statistical and Data Center (SDC), Buffalo NY, for her support in data abstraction and Kim Blaser for publications management. We also wish to thank BMS/ImClone for their industry support.

References (58)

  • T. Pochylski et al.

    Absence of point mutation in codons 12 and 13 of K-RAS oncogenein HPV-associated high grade dysplasia and squamous cell cervical carcinoma

    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

    (2003)
  • S. Kang et al.

    Inverse correlation between RASSF1A hypermethylation, KRAS and BRAF mutations in cervical adenocarcinoma

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2007)
  • K.I. Pappa et al.

    Consistent absence of BRAF mutations in cervical and endometrial cancer despite KRAS mutation status

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2006)
  • S. Bellone et al.

    Overexpression of epidermal growth factor type-1 receptor (EGF-R1) in cervical cancer: implications for Cetuximab-mediated therapy in recurrent/metastatic disease

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2007)
  • A.D. Santin et al.

    Effects of concurrent cisplatinum administration during radiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone on the immune function of patients with cancer of the uterine cervix

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2000)
  • A.D. Santin et al.

    Effect of blood transfusion during radiotherapy on the immune function of patients with cancer of the uterine cervix: role of interleukin-10

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2002)
  • A. Jemal et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2010

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2010)
  • J. Baselga

    New therapeutic agents targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor

    J Clin Oncol

    (2000)
  • E. Raymond et al.

    Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase as a target for anticancer therapy

    Drugs

    (2000)
  • J. Baselga

    Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor: a clinical reality

    J Clin Oncol

    (2001)
  • P.J. O'Dwyer et al.

    Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in colorectal cancer

    Semin Oncol

    (2002)
  • J. Mendelsohn et al.

    The EGF receptor family as targets for cancer therapy

    Oncogene

    (2000)
  • Y. Sako et al.

    Single-molecule imaging of EGFR signaling on the surface of living cells

    Nat Cell Biol

    (2000)
  • R.I. Nicholson et al.

    EGFR and cancer prognosis

    Eur J Cancer

    (2001)
  • J. Mendelsohn et al.

    Epidermal growth factor receptor family and chemosensitization

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1997)
  • R. Corvo et al.

    Biological predictors of response to radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: recent advances and emerging perspectives

    Tumori

    (2001)
  • A.M. Kersemaekers et al.

    Oncogene alterations in carcinomas of the uterine cervix: overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor is associated with poor prognosis

    Clin Cancer Res

    (1999)
  • G.E. Kim et al.

    Synchronous co-expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and cyclooxygenase-2 in carcinomas of the uterine cervix: a potential predictor of poor survival

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2004)
  • J. Baselga et al.

    Phase I studies of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor chimeric antibody C225 alone and in combination with cisplatin

    J Clin Oncol

    (2000)
  • Cited by (105)

    • Targeted therapy and molecular genetics

      2023, DiSaia and Creasman Clinical Gynecologic Oncology
    • Salvage (Re)radiation in Oligometastatic and Oligorecurrent Cervical Cancer

      2022, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was presented at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer, March 6–9, 2011, Orlando, Fl.

    ☆☆

    This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grants to the Gynecologic Oncology Group Administrative Office (CA 27469) and the Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical Office (CA 37517) and R01 CA122728-01A2 CA Grant to AS from the National Institutes of Health. The following Gynecologic Oncology Group member institutions participated in the primary treatment studies: Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Abington Memorial Hospital, University of Mississippi Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, University of California Medical Center at Irvine, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Washington University School of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Columbus Cancer Council, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Community Clinical Oncology Program.

    View full text