Elsevier

Gynecologic Oncology

Volume 110, Issue 2, August 2008, Pages 190-195
Gynecologic Oncology

Surgically staged high-risk endometrial cancer: Randomized study of adjuvant radiotherapy alone vs. sequential chemo-radiotherapy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.03.020Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Our purpose was to establish whether platinum-based chemotherapy combined with standard surgery and radiotherapy will improve overall and disease-free survival and lower the recurrence rate in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer.

Study design

A total of 156 patients with Stage IA–B Grade 3 (n = 28), or Stage IC–IIIA Grade 1–3 (n = 128) were postoperatively randomized to receive radiotherapy (56 Gy) only (Group A, n = 72) or radiotherapy combined with three courses of cisplatin (50 mg/m2), epirubicin (60 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2) (Group B, n = 84).

Results

The disease-specific overall five-year survival was in Group A 84.7% vs. 82.1% in Group B (p = 0.148). The median disease-free survival in A was 18 (range 9–36) months and 25 (range 12–49) months in B (p = 0.134), respectively. During a five-year follow-up 32 patients relapsed. Of the recurrences 5 were local and 20 distant, while 7 were combined. As calculated from the operation, the median time to recurrence was 15 (range 6–37) months in Group A, and 20 (range 8–60) months in Group B, respectively (p = 0.170). Twenty-six patients died of the disease during the five-year follow-up, 11 in A and 15 in B. The patients succumbing in A lived a median 23 (range 15–44) months as compared to 37 (range 13–50) months in B (p = 0.148).

Chemotherapy was associated with an acceptable rate of acute toxicity. Less than 8% of the patients complained of Grade 3/4 nausea. The rate of Grade 3/4 leucopenia was at the highest at 16.6% during the third cycle but only 6.2% of the patients had Grade 3 infection.

A total of 10 patients developed intestinal complications demanding surgery, 2 in Group A (2.7%) and 8 (9.5%) in Group B, respectively.

Conclusion

Adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide failed to improve overall survival or lower the recurrence rate in patients operated on and radiated for high-risk endometrial carcinoma. Chemotherapy was associated with a low rate of acute toxicity but appeared to increase the risk of bowel complications.

Introduction

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic cancer in Western countries with an annual incidence of 15–18/100,000 women. The majority or 82% of endometrial cancers are diagnosed at stages I and II [1]. Increasing tumor grade, myometrial invasion and the presence of extrauterine disease are associated with an increasing incidence of cervical involvement, adnexal and lymph node metastases, positive peritoneal cytology and hematogenous spread [2], [3], [4], [5]. Adjuvant radiation therapy given in high-risk situations involving e.g. deep myometrial invasion, cervical invasion, grade 3 histology has reduced the rate of pelvic relapses which is offset by a higher rate of distant metastases, thus diminishing the potential survival benefit [6, [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. The lack of an unequivocal survival benefit has generated the idea of adding chemotherapy to the treatment of high-risk endometrial cancer [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]. Reported response rates of recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma to chemotherapy have varied in a range of 20–50% [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31].

In Finland, the standard treatment of high-risk endometrial carcinoma has traditionally been a hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, followed by external pelvic radiation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide combined to the standard treatment would reduce the recurrence rate and improve survival.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

The study population consisted of 156 endometrial cancer patients treated in four Finnish university hospitals between April 1992 and April 1996 (Fig. 1). They were followed up until April 2001. All patients had locoregional high-risk endometrial carcinoma, or FIGO Stage IA–B Grade 3 or Stage IC–IIIA Grade 1–3, based on a surgical staging (Table 1). The surgical staging included a total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and peritoneal cytological sampling,

Results

The groups were similar in respect of age, body mass index and the type of operation. Neither did stage, grade or histopathological diagnosis differ statistically (Table 1).

Discussion

In the present study, sequential chemo-radiotherapy was not able to improve the final outcome of patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma although it tended to increase median disease-free survival by 7 months and to postpone the death in patients who would later die from disease by 14 months as compared to radiotherapy alone. However, there was no difference in the five-year overall survival between the groups. In fact, the five-year disease-free survival in the radiotherapy only group

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

References (43)

  • S.A. Reisinger et al.

    A phase I study of weekly cisplatin and whole abdominal radiation for the treatment of Stage III and IV endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group pilot study

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1996)
  • M.A. Dimopoulos et al.

    Paclitaxel and cisplatin in advanced or recurrent carcinoma of the endometrium: long term results of a phase II multicenter study

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2000)
  • J.T. Soper et al.

    Feasibility study of concurrent weekly cisplatin and whole abdominopelvic irradiation followed by doxorubicin/cisplatin chemotherapy for advanced stage endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group trial

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2004)
  • L.R. Duska et al.

    A pilot trial of TAC (paclitaxel, doxorubicin and carboplatin) chemotherapy with filgastrim (r-metHUG-CSF) support followed by radiotherapy in patients with “high-risk” endometrial cancer

    Gynecol Oncol

    (2005)
  • M.S. Hoffman et al.

    Treatment of recurrent and metastatic endometrial cancer with cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and megestrol acetate

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1989)
  • C.A. Stringer et al.

    Adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (PAC) for early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer: a preliminary analysis

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1990)
  • T.W. Burke et al.

    Postoperative adjuvant cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (PAC) chemotherapy in women with high-risk endometrial carcinoma

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1994)
  • M. Markman et al.

    Persistent chemosensitivity to platinum and/or paclitaxel in metastatic endometrial cancer

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1999)
  • B.D. Rufford et al.

    Endometrial cancer

    Curr Obstet Gynaecol

    (2001)
  • E. Hernandez

    Endometrial adenocarcinoma

    Obst Gyn Clin North Am

    (2001)
  • C. Irwin et al.

    The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in carcinoma of the endometrium — results in 550 patients with pathologic stage I disease

    Gynecol Oncol

    (1998)
  • Cited by (103)

    • Not all stage I and II endometrial cancers are created equal: Recurrence-free survival and cause-specific survival after observation or vaginal brachytherapy alone in all subgroups of early-stage high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer

      2022, Gynecologic Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      After further stratification to distinguish between outcomes of patients who underwent observation or VB versus more invasive adjuvant treatments (EBRT or chemotherapy), our results showed that subgroups of stage I endometrioid HIR EC (defined by the GOG-99/GOG-249) without or with at most one (<2) factor among grade 3, LVSI, or stage IB have a good prognosis after observation or VB alone. In these patients, 3-year CSS was higher than 95% (minimal lower 95% CI limit of 89.8%); therefore, if we assume as previous trials an absolute minimum margin of improvement in oncologic outcomes of 10% [7–9,12,13,18–21,23–25], our results suggest that adjuvant therapy other than VB may be considered an overtreatment (Fig. 2). Conversely, in endometrioid HIR EC subgroups with two or more (≥2) factors among grade 3, LVSI, or stage IB, observation or VB alone was associated with poorer RFS and CSS.

    • British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) uterine cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice

      2022, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
    • Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in high-risk endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2018, Gynecologic Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Due to differences in the effectiveness of survival, several different randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) to RT alone in the treatment of HREC after surgery. Nevertheless, the conclusions indicating that the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to radiation can provide a variable therapeutic benefit, with either an improvement in PFS alone or no benefit at all, have led to controversy over the utility of the regimen; the combination therapy has increased acute toxicities, however, in most cases it did not lead to long-term or permanent effects, and the regimen is well tolerated [19–25]. A meta-analysis including three RCTs and three observational studies suggested that no significant difference in survival was evident with CRT for HREC in FIGO stages I-III; however, a significant difference in survival was evident with CRT for advanced-stage endometrial cancer [26].

    • Adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer

      2022, Endometrial Cancer: Current Epidemiology, Detection and Management (Second Edition)
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text