International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Clinical InvestigationsA simple method of obtaining equivalent doses for use in HDR brachytherapy
Introduction
Most radiation oncologists are familiar with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. Recently, there has been a trend towards increased use of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy due to its advantages, namely that it eliminates radiation exposure to caregivers, requires only short treatment times, and that its dose distribution can be optimized by varying the dwell times. HDR is generally given as fractionated treatments to decrease normal tissue toxicity. The dose effect relationship in radiation therapy is not linear, but may be assumed to follow a linear-quadratic (LQ) function (1). Hence, doses from different treatment modalities cannot be added linearly to determine the combined effect. Many radiation oncologists are not very familiar with the fractionation schemes to be used in HDR brachytherapy. Further, there is a marked difference between the biological effects in the tumor and those in late reacting normal tissue (1). Besides, patients are often treated with external beam radiotherapy combined with HDR brachytherapy, which poses the added challenge of determining the combined effect of the two treatments.
One way to calculate the biologically equivalent doses (BEDs) of different dose fractionation schemes is to use the LQ equation (eq. 1 in Appendix 1). In this equation, the α/β ratio is usually taken to be 10 Gy for tumor/early effects and 3 Gy for late effects (2). The concept of LQ modeling is familiar to most radiation oncologists. However, this calculation is cumbersome, and the resultant BED values are not familiar to the clinicians. Further, it does not take into consideration that, in brachytherapy, doses to normal tissues are generally lower than doses to tumor tissues. For these reasons, radiobiological modeling is not widely used on a routine basis. However, simplifying the calculations for the LQ radiobiological model, applying a dose modifying factor (DMF) to take into consideration that the doses to normal tissues are different from the doses to the tumor, and expressing the results in terms of equivalent doses given at 2 Gy per day rather than as the BED would make it more likely that the LQ model would be used clinically.
With these considerations in mind, we developed a program that could be run on commonly available personal computers. This program quickly performs the calculations and express the results in clinically familiar equivalent doses given at 2 Gy per day, applying a DMF. The details of all calculations and formulations used in this article are explained in Appendix 1. The reader can program these calculations into an Excel spreadsheet; alternatively, a computer disk with this program can be made available to those requesting it.
Section snippets
Methods and materials
Excel program was selected because it is a commonly available spreadsheet for personal computers and is accessible to most clinicians. Inputs to this spreadsheet fall into two categories:
- 1.
Parameters affecting tissue characteristics and equivalence calculations: α/β ratio for early and late effects, dose per fraction for equivalence calculation, and normal tissue dose modifying factor for HDR brachytherapy (DMF). The default values of these parameters are set as follows: α/β ratio (late) = 3 Gy,
Results
Following are some examples of the use of this program.
Example 1. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) wished to develop a protocol that would allow the use of HDR brachytherapy to treat cancer of the cervix. Various doses of pelvic EBRT were to be allowed. We needed to determine the HDR dose per fraction required to deliver an equivalent tumor dose of about 85 Gy while keeping the equivalent dose for late effects below 75 Gy. The clinicians entered the various allowable pelvic EBRT
Discussion
Various empirical formulas, such as the nominal standard dose (NSD), cumulative radiation effect (CRE), and time-dose-fractionation (TDF), have been used to determine the equivalent doses of various dose fractionation schemes in the past (5). The LQ formula currently used is considered a better model because it is based on the radiation effect in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and can account for differences between tumor and normal tissue response 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. The LQ equation can be
Summary
A simple Excel spreadsheet program has been developed to assist clinicians to easily calculate equivalent doses to be used in HDR brachytherapy regimens. The novelty of this program is that the equivalent doses are expressed as if given at 2 Gy per fraction rather than as BED values, and a more realistic equivalent normal tissue effect is obtained by applying a DMF. Its ease of use should promote the use of LQ radiobiological modeling to determine HDR brachytherapy doses. The program is to be
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their gratitude to David Carpenter for editorial assistance. This study was supported in part by Grant 5P30CS16058 from the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
References (14)
- et al.
Survey of the Brachytherapy Practice for Carcinoma of the CervixA Report of the Clinical Research Committee of the American Brachytherapy Society
Gynecol Oncol
(1999) - et al.
A phase I/II study of external beam radiation, brachytherapy and concurrent chemotherapy in localized cancer of the esophagus (RTOG 92-07)Preliminary toxicity report
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1997) Is NSD-TDF useful to radiotherapy?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1985)Dose fractionation, dose-rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue responses
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1982)- et al.
The origins and basis of the linear-quadratic model
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1992) Tables of equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractionsA simple application of the linear quadratic formula
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1995)- et al.
Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1999)
Cited by (144)
Intensity modulated high dose rate ocular brachytherapy using Se-75
2021, BrachytherapyFIGO Classification 2018: Validation Study in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation
2020, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology PhysicsCitation Excerpt :Primary and nodal volume was estimated using available imaging dimensions with the application of the ellipsoid formula. Treatment parameters such as external radiation dose to the whole pelvis to a dose of 46 Gy in 23 fractions and brachytherapy (7 Gy × 4 fractions) was summated as equivalent dose in 2 Gy (EQD2) to point A or target as applicable.17 Cumulative nodal dose for each patient was calculated as a combination of primary external radiation, external nodal boost if any, and direct contribution from brachytherapy.
In Regard to Albuquerque et al
2020, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics