Early invasive cervical cancer with pelvic lymph node involvement: To complete or not to complete radical hysterectomy?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(90)90312-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The completion of radical hysterectomy in the face of pelvic lymph node involvement presents a dilemma for the surgeon. Some believe it is appropriate to abort the hysterectomy to avoid the excessive morbidity of combined treatment; others believe that completion of the hysterectomy enhances survival. This study was undertaken to define the impact of completing radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant radiation therapy upon patient survival or pelvic control. Fifteen patients with stage IB and IIA invasive cervical cancer whose radical hysterectomies were aborted solely for reasons of pelvic lymph node involvement were compared to a control group of 15 patients matched for tumor size and number of lymph nodes involved whose radical hysterectomies were completed. Both groups were treated with radiation therapy postoperatively. Survival was not different between groups (P = 0.81). Unexpectedly, local control was slightly improved in the group treated by radiation only (P = 0.127). If radiation therapy is anticipated, completion of radical hysterectomy followed by radiation therapy appears to offer no advantage over radiation therapy with the uterus in place in patients with early-stage invasive cervical cancer and pelvic lymph node involvement.

Cited by (51)

  • Completion of radical hysterectomy does not improve survival of patients with cervical cancer and intraoperatively detected lymph node involvement: ABRAX international retrospective cohort study

    2021, European Journal of Cancer
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, there are limited and inconsistent data for patients in whom radical hysterectomy was abandoned due to intraoperatively detected lymph node involvement. Prior studies included small, heterogeneous groups of patients, mostly with gross lymph node involvement that was not detected pre-operatively due to the absence of modern imaging in the work-up [10–16]. Therefore, we established collaboration with international gynaecological centres that saw a high volume of cervical cancer to obtain retrospective data on a large cohort of patients with intraoperatively detected lymph node involvement who underwent either radical uterine procedure followed by adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy or definitive chemoradiotherapy without a prior radical uterine procedure.

  • Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy

    2018, Principles of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery
  • Completed versus aborted radical hysterectomy for node-positive stage IB cervical cancer in the modern era of chemoradiation therapy

    2012, Gynecologic Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The authors concluded administration of adjuvant radiation following radical surgery is associated with significant morbidity. This concern has been noted in other studies as well [4,11] and is still a key concern noted among members of the SGO [10]. In our study, while no statistically significant difference was noted between cohorts due to the small study population, it is interesting that there was a seeming improvement in PFS and OS in patients undergoing completion of radical hysterectomy.

  • Intra-operative detection of nodal metastasis in early stage cervical cancer: A survey of the practice patterns of SGO members

    2011, Gynecologic Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    A large number of respondents stated that performance of RH before the administration of RT optimizes pelvic control. Of the 4 studies comparing outcomes between aborted and completed RH groups in early stage cervical cancer; pelvic control was not evaluated in one [6], better in the completed RH group in another [9], and not significantly different between groups in the remaining two studies [4,7]. Because patients who underwent aborted RH as compared to those who underwent completed RH for early stage cervical cancer were not uniform prognostically, it is unclear whether pelvic recurrence rates differ between these two groups.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text