Table 2

Considerations for high-risk disease and advanced ovarian cancer first-line treatment

QuestionVariablesAgreement (%)Disagreement (%)
Statements that achieved consensus
What characteristics are you considering when defining a patient of high-risk in your practice?Chemotherapy response should be assessed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy to define further systemic treatment decisions81.019.0
Regarding adding bevacizumab to first-line platinum-based regimen in patients with high-grade serous or high-grade endometrioid carcinomas with no previous bowel obstruction/sub-occlusion or extensive bowel resection, how do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Patients with homologous recombination deficiency tumors do not need to automatically receive bevacizumab first line82.018.0
Patients with BRCA mutation and/or homologous recombination deficiency tumors should receive bevacizumab first line, regardless of being ‘high-risk’12.088.0
Patients with BRCA wild-type/unknown and/or homologous recombination proficient/homologous recombination unknown tumors should receive bevacizumab upfront, regardless of being ‘high-risk’18.781.3
If an early good response (cycle 1–3) is achieved in platinum-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab, it is accepted that bevacizumab can be discontinued after terminating the chemotherapy, so that PARP inhibitor could be used as monotherapy maintenance treatment18.781.3
What characteristics are you considering when defining a patient of high-risk in your practice?High-risk advanced ovarian cancer is defined as FIGO III with residual disease after initial/interval cytoreduction or FIGO IV87.512.5
Worse chemotherapy response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be considered a high-risk characteristic81.318.7
Tumor primary chemosensitivity measured by worse KELIM scores may indicate a high-risk characteristic81.318.7
Regarding adding bevacizumab to first-line platinum-based regimen in patients with high-grade serous or high-grade endometrioid carcinomas and previous bowel obstruction/sub-occlusion or extensive bowel resection, how do you agree or disagree with the following statements?If an early good response (cycle 1–3) is achieved in platinum-based chemotherapy (ie, RECIST or KELIM score), it is accepted that bevacizumab is not added to chemotherapy, so that PARP inhibitor could be87.512.5
Patients with high-risk disease should receive bevacizumab upfront, regardless of BRCA/homologous recombination deficiency status12.587.5
Statements that did not achieve consensus
Regarding adding bevacizumab to first-line platinum-based regimen in patients with high-grade serous or high-grade endometrioid carcinomas with no previous bowel obstruction/sub-occlusion or extensive bowel resection, how do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Patients with high-risk disease should receive bevacizumab upfront, regardless of BRCA/homologous recombination deficiency status25.075.0
Regarding adding bevacizumab to first-line platinum-based regimen in patients with high-grade serous or high-grade endometrioid carcinomas and previous bowel obstruction/sub-occlusion or extensive bowel resection, how do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Patients with BRCA wild-type/unknown and/or homologous recombination proficient/homologous recombination unknown tumors should receive bevacizumab upfront, regardless of being ‘high-risk’25.075.0
Poor chemosensitivity after 1–3 cycles of initial chemotherapy (eg, determined by RECIST or KELIM score) should be an indication for adding bevacizumab75.025.0
  • Bold values indicate the achieved (≥80% agreement or disagreement) or nearest-to-consensus across each statement. Furthermore the bold statements help indicate the differences among the patient characteristics.

  • FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; KELIM, CA-125 elimination rate constant K; PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.