Table 1

Major characteristics of studies included in the systematic review

Author/yearAccrual timeStudy typeN totalN early (I-IIA) low-grade serousAge (years)FIGO stage clinically presumedHistologic subtype gradeProcedure/fertility-preservingProcedure/primary vs re-staging
Bogani 201713 1975–2016Retrospective2903749.8 (18.1–76) medianI-II (85.9%, 14.1%)Low-gradeHysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, peritoneal random peritoneal biopsies; omentectomyBoth
Minig 201714 2000–2016Retrospective1635650 median (18–81) whole cohortILow-gradeBilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (97.5%), hysterectomy (82.8%), omentectomy (98.8%), and appendectomy (68.1%)Both
Heitz 201816 2000–2016Retrospective762557 median (18–82) whole cohortpT1a-pT2aM0 (I-II)Grade 1Staging surgeryPrimary
Nasioudis 201820 1988–2014Population-based SEER12426751 medianIA, IB, ICGrade 1NRNR
Wafa 201918 2000–2017Retrospective37448 (26–76) whole cohortpT1a-pT2aM0 (I-II)Low-gradePrimary surgeryPrimary
Simon 202015 2000–2017Retrospective1261153 median (19–82)I-IILow-gradeNRPrimary
Chen 202117 2005–2015Retrospective19637NR as median or averageI-IIALow-gradeNRNR
Durmuş 202219 1999–2018Retrospective1486049.1 mean (21–84)IGrade 1/low-gradeBoth (complete surgery consisted of total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and peritoneal biopsies)Primary
Total2964277
  • FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; NR, not reported; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program.