Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the population

Baseline characteristicsNon-conization (n=187)Conization (n=187)P value
Age (years) (mean (SD))48.11 (9.59)45.85 (10.22)0.91
Body mass index (kg/m2) (mean (SD))26.44 (6.18)25.05 (4.64)0.12
Race (n (%))0.36
Caucasian155 (82.9)165 (88.2)
Asian6 (3.2)8 (4.3)
Latin American5 (2.7)2 (1.1)
African2 (1.1)0 (0.0)
Not reported19 (10.1)12 (6.4)
Performance status (n (%))0.12
ECOG 0166 (88.8)174 (93.0)
ECOG 116 (8.6)6 (3.2)
Not reported5 (2.6)7 (3.8)
Approach (n (%))0.76
MIS90 (48.1)93 (49.7)
Robotic6 (6.4)17 (18.7)
Open97 (51.9)94 (50.3)
Colpoprotective maneuvers (n (%))35 (18.7)35 (18.7)1
No use of uterine manipulator (n (%))109 (67.7)123 (71.5)0.45
Histotype (n (%))0.83
Squamous131 (70.1)131 (70.1)
Adenocarcinoma49 (26.2)51 (27.3)
Adenosquamous7 (3.7)5 (2.7)
Tumor grade (n (%))0.34
G135 (18.7)42 (22.5)
G296 (51.3)82 (43.9)
G356 (29.9)63 (33.7)
Largest tumor diameter (n (%))0.12
≤2 cm119 (63.6)133 (71.1)
>2 cm68 (36.4)54 (28.9)
Depth of invasion (n (%))0.78
Superficial <1/369 (36.9)75 (40.1)
Intermediate 1/3–2/380 (42.8)74 (39.6)
Deep >2/338 (20.3)38 (20.3)
Lymphovascular space invasion (n (%))0.67
No114 (61.0)110 (58.8)
Yes73 (39.0)77 (41.2)
Parametrial invasion (n (%))0.32
Negative183 (98.0)182 (97.3)
Positive3 (1.5)1 (0.5)
Not reported1 (0.5)4 (2.2)
Margins status of radical hysterectomy specimen (n (%))1
Negative175 (93.6)175 (93.6)
Positive or close ≤2 mm12 (6.4)12 (6.4)
Nodal status (n (%))0.46
Negative173 (92.5)165 (90.4)
Positive14 (7.5)18 (9.6)
FIGO staging 2009 (n (%))0.56
IB1 ≤2 cm103 (55.1)94 (50.3)
IB1 >2 cm65 (34.8)75 (40.1)
IB2-II–III19 (10.2)18 (9.6)
Adjuvant therapy (n (%))0.91
None107 (57.2)108 (57.8)
Yes80 (42.8)79 (42.2)
  • ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; MIS, minimally invasive surgery.