Table 3

Compliance of the peri-operative management with the standards of care

QI 8 - Proportion of cases of early-stage endometrial carcinoma with non ruptured uterus after hysterectomy
TypeOutcome indicator
DescriptionUterus should be removed intact. Intra-operative rupturing/fragmentation/morcellation of the uterus (including in a bag) must be avoided
SpecificationsNumerator: number of patients with early-stage endometrial carcinoma after hysterectomy with intact/non-ruptured/non-fragmented/non-morcellated uterus
Denominator: all patients with early-stage (I-II) endometrial carcinoma who underwent hysterectomy.
Target99%
QI 9 - Proportion of patients with early-stage endometrial carcinoma who have undergone successful minimally invasive surgery
TypeOutcome indicator
DescriptionMinimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic or robotic) is considered successful if performed without any intra-peritoneal tumor spillage, tumor rupture, or morcellation (including in a bag). If vaginal extraction risks uterine rupture, other measures should be taken (eg, mini-laparotomy, use of endobag). If a mini-laparotomy for such purpose is performed within a minimally invasive procedure, the surgery is still considered a successful minimally invasive surgery
SpecificationsNumerator: number of patients with presumed early-stage endometrial carcinoma who have undergone successful minimally invasive surgery (as defined above)
Denominator: all patients who have undergone surgery for presumed early-stage (I–II) endometrial carcinoma
TargetsOptimal target: ≥80%
Minimum required target: 60%
QI 10 - Proportion of patients with BMI >35 kg/m² who have undergone successful minimally invasive surgery
TypeOutcome indicator
DescriptionMinimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic or robotic surgery) is considered successful if performed without any intra-peritoneal tumor spillage, tumor rupture, or morcellation (including in a bag). If vaginal extraction risks uterine rupture, other measures should be taken (eg, mini-laparotomy, use of endobag). If a mini-laparotomy for such purpose is performed within a minimally invasive procedure, the surgery is still considered a successful minimal invasive surgery
SpecificationsNumerator: number of patients with BMI >35 kg/m² with presumed early-stage endometrial carcinoma who have undergone successful minimally invasive surgery (as defined above)
Denominator: all patients with BMI >35 kg/m² who have undergone surgery for presumed early-stage (I–II) endometrial carcinoma
Target>60%
QI 11 - Proportion of conversions from minimally invasive surgery to open surgery
TypeOutcome indicator
DescriptionMinimally invasive surgery includes laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Conversions to laparotomy occur due to intra-operative findings or complications. Mini-laparotomy to extract the uterus is not considered as conversion to laparotomy
SpecificationsNumerator: number of patients with endometrial carcinoma who have undergone minimally invasive surgery in whom a conversion to open surgery has been required
Denominator: all patients with endometrial carcinoma who have undergone minimally invasive surgery
Target<10%
QI 12 - Proportion of patients with intra-operative injuries
TypeOutcome indicator
DescriptionIntra-operative injuries include positioning complications and urinary, bowel, vascular, and neural injuries
SpecificationsNumerator: number of patients with endometrial carcinoma who have undergone a surgery in whom intra-operative injuries as described above have been reported
Denominator: all patients with endometrial carcinoma who have undergone a surgery
Target<2%
QI 13 - Proportion of infracolic omentectomy in patients with endometrial carcinoma and presumed early-stage serous, undifferentiated carcinoma or carcinosarcoma
TypeOutcome indicator
DescriptionAccording to the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines, staging infracolic omentectomy should be performed in apparent uterus-confined serous, undifferentiated carcinoma, or carcinosarcoma
SpecificationsNumerator: number of patients with endometrial carcinoma and presumed early-stage serous, undifferentiated carcinoma, or carcinosarcoma who underwent infracolic omentectomy
Denominator: all patients with endometrial carcinoma and presumed early-stage (I–II) serous, undifferentiated carcinoma, or carcinosarcoma who underwent surgery
Target≥90%
QI 14 - Proportion of lymph node staging performed in patients with presumed early-stage high-intermediate or high-risk endometrial carcinoma
TypeOutcome indicator
DescriptionAccording to the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines, surgical lymph node staging should be performed in patients with early-stage endometrial carcinoma deemed pre-operatively as high-intermediate or high risk Sentinel lymph node biopsy is an acceptable alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy for lymph node staging in stage I–II. Sentinel lymph node procedure and lymph node dissection are taken into account for lymph node staging
SpecificationsNumerator: number of patients with presumed early-stage high-intermediate or high-risk endometrial carcinoma who underwent lymph node staging
Denominator: all patients with presumed early-stage (I–II) high-intermediate or high-risk endometrial carcinoma who underwent surgery
Target>85%
QI 15 - Proportion of sentinel lymph node procedures in patients undergoing lymph node staging
TypeOutcome indicator
DescriptionLymph node staging in early-stage (I–II) endometrial carcinoma is defined as sentinel lymph node procedure and/or systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy
SpecificationsNumerator: number of patients with early-stage endometrial carcinoma for whom sentinel lymph node procedure was attempted or performed
Denominator: all patients with early-stage (I–II) endometrial carcinoma who have undergone a lymph node staging
Target90%
QI 16 - Number of sentinel lymph node procedures for endometrial carcinoma performed or supervised per surgeon per year
TypeOutcome indicator
DescriptionSentinel lymph node procedures require high surgeon skills to improve the identification rate and to minimize the false-negative rate. Sentinel lymph node procedures should be performed by a certified gynecologic oncologist or a trained surgeon specifically dedicated to gynecological cancer management (see QI 3). Surgeons must ensure that their colleagues in radiology, nuclear medicine, and/or pathology are actively involved in the successful implementation of this multi-disciplinary procedure
SpecificationsNumerator: number of sentinel lymph node procedures performed or supervised in patients with endometrial carcinoma per surgeon per year
Denominator: not applicable
Target≥20
QI 17 - Proportion of indocyanine green cervical injection
TypeOutcome indicator
DescriptionAccording to the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines, indocyanine green cervical injection is the preferred detection technique
SpecificationsNumerator: number of patients with presumed early-stage endometrial carcinoma in whom indocyanine green cervical injection was performed
Denominator: all patients with presumed early-stage (stage I–II) endometrial carcinoma who underwent sentinel lymph node procedure
Target≥95%
QI 18 - Proportion of high-intermediate/high-risk patients with side-specific systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cases of failed sentinel lymph node detection
TypeOutcome indicator
DescriptionAccording to the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines, side-specific systematic lymphadenectomy should be performed in high-intermediate/high-risk patients if sentinel lymph node is not detected on either pelvic side. Low-risk and intermediate-risk patients are not taken into account as systematic lymphadenectomy is not recommended in these patients
SpecificationsNumerator: number of high-intermediate/high-risk patients who underwent side-specific or bilateral systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy
Denominator: all high-intermediate/high-risk patients with unilaterally or bilaterally failed sentinel lymph node detection
Target>90%
QI 19 - Proportion of patients who underwent ultrastaging of sentinel lymph nodes
TypeOutcome indicator
DescriptionIntensive pathologic assessment of sentinel lymph node (sentinel lymph node ultrastaging) supports the detection of small metastases which could be missed by standard evaluation. According to the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines, pathologic ultrastaging of sentinel lymph nodes is recommended, although there is no universal ultrastaging protocol
SpecificationsNumerator: number of patients who underwent ultrastaging of sentinel lymph nodes
Denominator: all patients who underwent a sentinel lymph node procedure
Target≥99%
QI 20 - Proportion of bilateral mapping rate of sentinel lymph node procedures
TypeOutcome indicator
DescriptionThe ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines suggest cervical injections of indocyanine green as the preferred technique to detect sentinel lymph nodes. Tracer re-injection is an option if sentinel lymph node is not visualized upfront. The aim is bilateral detection of sentinel lymph nodes
SpecificationsNumerator: number of patients with presumed early-stage endometrial carcinoma who underwent successful bilateral sentinel lymph node detection
Denominator: all patients with presumed early-stage (stage I–II) endometrial carcinoma who underwent sentinel lymph node procedure
Target≥75%
QI 21 - Proportion of complete macroscopic resection for curative intent in patients with primary advanced endometrial carcinoma (stage III–IV)
TypeOutcome indicator
DescriptionIn advanced endometrial carcinoma (stage III–IV), surgical tumor debulking, including removal of enlarged lymph nodes, should be considered when complete macroscopic resection (no residual disease) is feasible with an acceptable morbidity and quality of life profile. Debulking surgery should be preceded by a full pre-operative staging and discussion by a multi-disciplinary team. This includes patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy
SpecificationsNumerator: number of patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma who have undergone a cytoreductive surgery and in whom complete macroscopic resection was achieved
Denominator: all patients with primary advanced endometrial carcinoma (stage III–IV) who have undergone a cytoreductive surgery
Target≥75%
QI 22- Proportion of patients who underwent salvage surgery for loco-regional recurrent disease (isolated pelvic or nodal recurrent disease) in whom complete macroscopic resection is achieved
TypeOutcome indicator
DescriptionIndications of salvage surgery for loco-regional recurrent disease are defined according to the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines, as follows:
Treatment of patients with recurrent endometrial carcinoma involves a multi-disciplinary approach with surgery, radiotherapy, and/or systemic therapy depending on the fitness and wishes of the patient, the tumor dissemination patterns, and prior treatment
In radiotherapy naïve patients, a decision about surgery needs to take account of patient morbidity and wishes, available non-surgical treatments, and resources. The interval between primary treatment and recurrences should also be taken into consideration. Patients with recurrent disease (including peritoneal and lymph node relapse) should be considered for surgery only if it is anticipated that complete removal of macroscopic disease can be achieved with acceptable morbidity
In radiotherapy pre-treated patients (external beam radiotherapy ±brachytherapy) with loco-regional recurrence, radical surgery, including exenteration, should be considered when the intention is complete resection with clear margins
SpecificationsNumerator: number of patients in whom complete macroscopic resection and clear margins (if applicable) are achieved
Denominator: all patients who underwent salvage surgery for recurrent disease (isolated pelvic or nodal recurrent disease)
Target≥85%