Table 1

Characteristics of patients for surgical approach, before and after inverse probability of treatment weighting

CharacteristicCohort before inverse probability of treatment
weighting
Cohort after inverse probability of treatment
weighting**
Laparotomy (n=697)Laparoscopy (n=688)P-valueLaparotomy (n=698)Laparoscopy (n=681)P-value*
Age < 0.001 0.949
 22–39145 (20.8%)230 (33.4%)188 (26.9%)187 (27.5%)
 40–49190 (27.3%)230 (33.4%)214 (30.6%)211 (31.0%)
 50–59198 (28.4%)168 (24.4%)185 (26.6%)183 (26.8%)
 >=60164 (23.5%)60 (8.7%)111 (15.9%)100 (14.7%)
FIGO stage0.2440.926
 IA115 (2.2%)9 (1.3%)12 (1.7%)10 (1.5%)
 IA235 (5.0%)45 (6.5%)42 (6.0%)40 (5.9%)
 IB1647 (92.8%)634 (92.2%)644 (92.3%)631 (92.6%)
Histology0.3730.926
 Adenocarcinoma196 (28.1%)214 (31.1%)208 (29.8%)206 (30.3%)
 Adenosquamous34 (4.9%)27 (3.9%)28 (4.0%)24 (3.6%)
 Squamous467 (67.0%)447 (65.0%)462 (66.3%)451 (66.2%)
Histological grade < 0.001 0.983
 Grade 171 (10.2%)141 (20.5%)104 (15.0%)106 (15.6%)
 Grade 2437 (62.7%)388 (56.4%)420 (60.2%)409 (60.0%)
 Grade 3104 (14.9%)102 (14.8%)104 (14.9%)102 (15.0%)
 Missing85 (12.2%)57 (8.3%)69 (10.0%)65 (9.5%)
Tumor size0.6510.925
 <=2 cm490 (70.3%)489 (71.1%)492 (70.6%)486 (71.3%)
 >2 cm194 (27.8%)182 (26.5%)188 (27.0%)181 (26.5%)
 Missing13 (1.9%)17 (2.5%)17 (2.4%)15 (2.2%)
Cone biopsy0.6520.993
 Yes268 (38.5%)277 (40.3%)273 (39.1%)266 (39.1%)
 No428 (61.4%)409 (59.4%)423 (60.7%)413 (60.7%)
 Missing1 (0.1%)2 (0.3%)1 (0.2%)2 (0.2%)
Year of procedure < 0.001 0.977
 2006–2008127 (18.2%)57 (8.3%)93 (13.3%)86 (12.7%)
 2009–2011254 (36.4%)160 (23.3%)210 (30.1%)203 (29.9%)
 2012–2014184 (26.4%)253 (36.8%)220 (31.5%)217 (31.8%)
 2015–2017132 (18.9%)218 (31.7%)174 (25.0%)175 (25.7%)
Adjuvant treatment 0.028 0.409
 Yes233 (33.4%)193 (28.1%)214 (30.7%)199 (29.2%)
 No463 (66.4%)490 (71.2%)482 (69.1%)479 (70.3%)
 Missing1 (0.1%)5 (0.7%)1 (0.1%)3 (0.5%)
  • *The P-values were calculated by inverse probability of treatment-weighted logistic-regression models. Bold P-values are statistically significant.

  • †Counts in the weighted cohort may not sum to expected totals owing to rounding.