Table 3

Prognostic classification discordances between clinical risk of relapse and molecular groups

Clinical risk of relapse*Molecular groups†TotalTotal discordant
POLE/ultramutated-likeMSI/hypermutated-like (MMR deficient)TP53-mutated classifiedNot otherwise classifiedUndefined‡
Low210519440 (100%)5 (13%)
Intermediate15113121 (100%)1 (5%)
High-intermediate0415111 (100%)9 (82%)
High114159140 (100%)24 (60%)
Advanced/metastatic018009 (100%)
Undefined010304 (100%)
Total4 (100%)35 (100%)30 (100%)49 (100%)7 (100%)125 (100%)39 (31%)
  • Tumors with a mutation within the POLE exonuclease domain were classified as POLE/ultramutated-like; other tumors with a loss of expression of one of the MMR couple were classified as MSI/hypermutated-like (MMR deficient); others tumors with mutation within the TP53 coding sequence were classified as TP53-mutated classified tumors; all other tumors were classified as not otherwise classified tumors. Note that the advanced/metastatic group does not formally belong to the clinical risk of relapse classification but is denoted here for the sake of clarity.

  • *Based on ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus.3 4

  • †Molecular classification based on targeted sequencing combined with MMR system immunostaining—see Methods.

  • ‡“Undefined tumors” refers to unclassified tumors because of technically uninformative MMR system immunostaining (technical failure, see Table 1 and online supplementary Table S1).

  • ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO, European Society for Medical Oncology-European Society of Gynaecological Oncology-European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology; MMR, mismatch repair system; MSI, microsatellite instability.