Table 1

Patient baseline characteristics: well balanced between the robotic and laparotomy groups

VariableTotal
(n=135)
Robotic surgery
(n=77)
Laparotomy
(n=58)
Age, median (range), year63 (40–89)64 (40–89)63 (48–83)
Follow-up, median (range), year4.6 (1.1–8.8)5.9 (1.1–8.8)4.2 (1.9–8.8)
Grade, n (%)
 137 (27.4)27 (35.1)10 (17.2)
 288 (65.2)45 (58.4)43 (74.1)
 310 (7.4)5 (6.5)5 (8.6)
Depth of myometrial invasion, n (%)
 <50%62 (45.9)33 (42.9)29 (50.0)
 >50%73 (54.1)44 (57.1)29 (50.0)
LVSI, n (%)31 (23.0)19 (24.7)12 (20.7)
Adjuvant RT, n (%)
 EBRT28 (20.7)15 (19.5)13 (22.4)
 VBT107 (79.3)62 (80.5)45 (77.6)
Time interval between surgery and adjuvant RT, median (range), days77 (22–187)85 (46–187)66 (22–125)
LN dissection, n (%)107 (79.3)66 (85.7)41 (70.7)
Number of LN sampled, mean±SD9.1±5.08.8±4.99.6±5.1
HIR patients, number (%)61 (45.2)36 (46.8)25 (43.1)
  • Differences between the two groups were not statistically significant across all variables (p=ns). (If two of the three criteria are met: age 60 years or older, >50% myometrial invasion, grade 3).

  • EBRT, external-beam radiotherapy; HIR, high-intermediate risk; LN, lymph node; LVSI, lymphovascular space invasion; RT, radiotherapy; VBT, vaginal brachytherapy.