TY - JOUR T1 - Discrepancy between magnetic resonance and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography imaging in a case of borderline ovarian tumor JF - International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer JO - Int J Gynecol Cancer SP - 1031 LP - 1033 DO - 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00923.x VL - 17 IS - 5 AU - W. Ju AU - S. C. Kim Y1 - 2007/09/01 UR - http://ijgc.bmj.com/content/17/5/1031.abstract N2 - Borderline ovarian tumors have a far more favorable clinical course compared to malignant ovarian tumors. To date, the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the differentiation of an ovarian mass remains controversial. Discrepancy between FDG-PET and magnetic resonance (MR) images is rare but may cause a serious dilemma in decision-making. We report a case of a borderline ovarian tumor showing discrepancy between MR and FDG-PET findings. FDG-PET findings may help with the differentiation of ovarian masses when clinical findings are not coincidental. ER -