RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 FARGO-360: a multi-disciplinary survey of practice and perspectives on provision of care for patients with frailty presenting with gynecological cancers in the UK and Ireland
JF International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer
JO Int J Gynecol Cancer
FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
SP 924
OP 930
DO 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003396
VO 32
IS 7
A1 Yee-Loi Louise Wan
A1 Gemma Cass
A1 Anna Collins
A1 Meera Adishesh
A1 Susan Addley
A1 Holly Baker-Rand
A1 Rasiah Bharathan
A1 Dominic Blake
A1 James Beirne
A1 Lisa Canavan
A1 James Dilley
A1 Gary Fitzgibbon
A1 Kate Glennon
A1 Narthana Ilenkovan
A1 Eleanor Jones
A1 Tabassum Khan
A1 Thumuluru Kavitha Madhuri
A1 Victoria McQueen
A1 Alison Montgomery
A1 Rachel Louise O'Donnell
A1 Sven Watmore
A1 Philip White
A1 Gemma Louise Owens
A1 ,
YR 2022
UL http://ijgc.bmj.com/content/32/7/924.abstract
AB Objectives Frailty has been associated with worse cancer-related outcomes for people with gynecological cancers. However, the lack of clear guidance on how to assess and modify frailty prior to instigating active treatments has the potential to lead to large variations in practice and outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate current practice and perspectives of healthcare practitioners on the provision of care for patients with frailty and a gynecological cancer.Methods Data were collected via a questionnaire-based survey distributed by the Audit and Research in Gynecological Oncology (ARGO) collaborative to healthcare professionals who identified as working with patients with gynecological malignancies in the United Kingdom (UK) or Ireland. Study data were collected using REDCap software hosted at the University of Manchester. Responses were collected over a 16 week period between January and April 2021.Results A total of 206 healthcare professionals (30 anesthetists (14.6%), 30 pre-operative nurses (14.6%), 51 surgeons (24.8%), 34 cancer specialist nurses (16.5%), 21 medical/clinical oncologists (10.2%), 25 physiotherapists/occupational therapists (12.1%) and 15 dieticians (7.3%)) completed the survey. The respondents worked at 19 hospital trusts across the UK and Ireland. Frailty scoring was not routinely performed in 63% of care settings, yet the majority of practitioners reported modifying their practice when providing and deciding on care for patients with frailty. Only 16% of organizations surveyed had a dedicated pathway for assessment and management of patients with frailty. A total of 37% of respondents reported access to prehabilitation services, 79% to enhanced recovery, and 27% to community rehabilitation teams.Conclusion Practitioners from all groups surveyed considered that appropriate training, dedicated pathways for optimization, frailty specific performance indicators and evidence that frailty scoring had an impact on clinical outcomes and patient experience could all help to improve care for frail patients.Data are available upon reasonable request.