PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Mai Partridge Vandborg AU - René dePont Christensen AU - Jakob Kragstrup AU - Kasper Edwards AU - Peter Vedsted AU - Dorte Gilså Hansen AU - Ole Mogensen TI - Reasons for Diagnostic Delay in Gynecological Malignancies AID - 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31821d2770 DP - 2011 Aug 01 TA - International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer PG - 967--974 VI - 21 IP - 6 4099 - http://ijgc.bmj.com/content/21/6/967.short 4100 - http://ijgc.bmj.com/content/21/6/967.full SO - Int J Gynecol Cancer2011 Aug 01; 21 AB - Introduction: To describe the different delay types in women with gynecological cancer and to analyze the relationship between diagnostic delay and a number of characteristics for patients, cancers, and the health care system.Method: Data were obtained from 4 different questionnaires, the Electronic Patient Journal (EPJ), and the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database (DGCD). A total of 161 women with ovarian cancer (63), endometrial cancer (50), cervical cancer (34), and vulvar cancer (14) were included. Outcome measures were different delay types counted in days and 4 clinically important variables' impact on the diagnostic delay: presence of alarm symptoms, age (divided into 2 groups: ≤60 or >60 years), performance of gynecological examination by the general practitioner (GP), and notification of cancer suspicion on first referral from GP.Results: Across cancer types, median total delay was 101 days. Some 10% of women experienced the longest delay with a total delay of 436 days or more. Vulva cancer had the longest delay, whereas women with ovarian cancer had the shortest delay. More than one third (39%) of the women consulted their GP for reasons other than the predefined alarm symptoms. Gynecological examination by the GP was less likely to be performed if the woman did not present with vaginal bleeding. The length of the delay was shortened by performance of a gynecological examination by the GP and a primary referral from the GP raising the receiver's suspicion of cancer.Conclusion: Reducing diagnostic delays should be achievable, particularly for those most delayed, and interventions aimed at reducing delays need to be developed. Creation of new valid instruments for measuring delay is essential in future research.