TY - JOUR T1 - Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size <span class="underline">&lt;</span>2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis JF - International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer JO - Int J Gynecol Cancer SP - 983 LP - 990 DO - 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002505 VL - 31 IS - 7 AU - Dimitrios Nasioudis AU - Benjamin B Albright AU - Emily M Ko AU - Ashley F Haggerty AU - Robert L Giuntoli II AU - Sarah H Kim AU - Mark A Morgan AU - Nawar A Latif Y1 - 2021/07/01 UR - http://ijgc.bmj.com/content/31/7/983.abstract N2 - Objective To investigate the oncologic outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size &lt;2 cm who underwent open or minimally invasive radical hysterectomy.Methods The Pubmed/Medline, Embase, and Web-of-Science databases were queried from inception to January 2021 (PROSPERO CRD 42020207971). Observational studies reporting progression-free survival and/or overall survival for patients who had open or minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size &lt;2 cm were selected. Level of statistical heterogeneity was evaluated with the I2 statistic. A random-effects model was used to compare progression and overall survival between the two groups and HR with 95% confidence intervals were calculated with the Der Simonian and Laird approach. Risk of bias and quality of included studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.Results A total of 10 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included encompassing 4935 patients. Of these, 2394 (48.5%) patients had minimally invasive and 2541 (51.5%) patients had open radical hysterectomy; respectively. Patients who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy had worse progression-free survival than those who had open surgery (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.20, 2.36, I2 26%). Based on five studies, patients who had minimally invasive (n=1808) hysterectomy had a trend towards worse overall survival than those who had open surgery (n=1853) (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.68, I2 15%).Conclusion Based on a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of studies that control for confounders, for patients with cervical cancer and tumor size &lt;2 cm, minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was associated with worse progression-free survival than laparotomy.Data are available upon reasonable request. ER -