PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Javier de Santiago
AU  - Carmen Yelo
AU  - Maria F Chereguini
AU  - Ana Conde
AU  - Javier Galipienzo
AU  - David Salvatierra
AU  - Manuel Linero
AU  - Sonsoles Alonso
TI  - COVID-19: gynecologic cancer surgery at a single center in Madrid
AID  - 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001638
DP  - 2020 Aug 01
TA  - International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer
PG  - 1108--1112
VI  - 30
IP  - 8
4099  - http://ijgc.bmj.com/content/30/8/1108.short
4100  - http://ijgc.bmj.com/content/30/8/1108.full
SO  - Int J Gynecol Cancer2020 Aug 01; 30
AB  - Objectives While numerous medical facilities have been forced to suspend oncological surgery due to system overload, debate has emerged on using non-surgical options on cancer cases during the pandemic. The goal of our study was to analyze, in a retrospective cohort study, the results of gynecological cancer surgery and evaluate postoperative complications in a single center in one of the most affected areas in Europe.Methods We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients who were referred between March 2020 and May 2020 for primary surgical treatment of breast, endometrial, ovarian, cervical, or vulvar cancer.Results The study included a total of 126 patients. Median age was 60 years (range 29–89). Patients were referred with breast (76/126, 60.3%), endometrial (29/126, 23%), ovarian (14/126, 11.1%), cervical (5/126, 4%), or vulvar cancer (2/126, 1.6%). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) was only conducted in 50% of cases due to the low availability of tests during the first phase of our study, and was indicated only in suspected cases according to the healthcare authorities' protocol. Median hospital stay was 1 day (range 0–18). Excluding breast surgery, laparoscopy was the most used procedure (43/126, 34.1%). 15 patients had a postoperative complication (15/126, 11.9%); only in 2 patients (2/15 13.3%) were there reports of Clavien–Dindo grade 3 or 4 complications. 6 patients tested positive for COVID-19 following a PCR diagnostic test, and these surgeries were cancelled.Conclusions Adequate protective measures in the setting of COVID-19 free institutions enabled the continuity of cancer surgery without significant compromise of the safety of patients or healthcare workers.