You are here

  • Home
  • Online First
  • Association between Silva pattern-based classification and endocervical adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Article Text

Article menu
Original research
Association between Silva pattern-based classification and endocervical adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  1. Mengmeng Chen1,2,
  2. Ling Han1,2,
  3. Yisi Wang1,2,
  4. Yali Chen1,2 and
  5. Ai Zheng1,2
    1. 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sichuan University West China Second University Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
    2. 2Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University West China Second University Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
    1. Correspondence to Yali Chen; yalichen182{at}163.com

    Abstract

    Objective To determine the relationship between the Silva pattern-based classification system and endocervical adenocarcinoma.

    Methods The PubMed, Embase, Central Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for studies that investigated the correlation between the Silva classification system and the oncology prognosis or pathological features of endocervical adenocarcinoma, published in the period from January 2013 to March 2024.

    Results A total of 19 eligible studies including 3122 cases were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The combined death rate in the Silva A, Silva B, and Silva C patterns was 0% (95% CI 0.0% to 0.4%), 2.6% (95% CI 0.4% to 5.9%), and 14.0% (95% CI 9.4% to 19.2%), respectively; the combined recurrence rate in the Silva A, Silva B, and Silva C patterns was 0.1% (95% CI 0.0% to 1.2%), 5.1% (95% CI 1.6% to 10.0%), and 19.4% (95% CI 14.7% to 24.4%), respectively; the combined lymphovascular invasion rate in the Silva A, Silva B, and Silva C patterns was 0% (95% CI 0.0% to 0.5%), 21.0% (95% CI 16.9% to 25.4%), and 58.8% (95% CI 50.1% to 67.3%), respectively; and the combined International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) I rate in the Silva A, Silva B, and Silva C patterns was 99.3% (95% CI 97.6% to 100%), 93.7% (95% CI 86.4% to 98.7%), and 82.4% (95% CI 74.9% to 88.9%), respectively.

    Conclusion Our study found that Silva A was negatively correlated with death rate, while Silva C was positively correlated. There was no correlation regarding the death rate for Silva B. Based on these findings, it is suggested that the Silva pattern-based classification system can predict the prognosis of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related endocervical adenocarcinoma and assist in guiding patient treatment.

    • Adenocarcinoma

    Data availability statement

    Data are available in a public, open access repository. In accordance with the journal’s guidelines, we will provide our data for independent analysis by a selected team by the Editorial Team for the purposes of additional data analysis or for the reproducibility of this study in other centers if such is requested.

    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

    This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, an indication of whether changes were made, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

    https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005639

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

      Request Permissions

      If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

      WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC

      • The Silva pattern-based classification was proposed to evaluate the patterns of invasion in human papillomavirus (HPV)-related endocervical adenocarcinoma and classifies endocervical adenocarcinoma as patterns A, B, and C.

      WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

      • This review presents data comparing the oncology prognosis of HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma between Silva pattern-based classes. It was found that patients with Silva C pattern have worse outcomes than those with Silva A, while the Silva B pattern shows no clear correlation with outcomes.

      HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY

      • Using the Silva pattern-based classification enables personalized treatment plans for HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma. For patients with Silva A, conservative treatment may be considered, while for those with Silva C, adjuvant treatment may be more appropriate.

      Introduction

      Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in terms of both incidence and mortality in women, with an estimated 660 000 new cases and 350 000 deaths worldwide in 2022.1 Among them, cervical squamous cell carcinoma accounts for 80–85% of cases and endocervical adenocarcinoma accounts for 10–15%.2 With the popularization of cervical cancer screening and the promotion of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, the incidence of cervical squamous carcinoma has decreased while the incidence rate of endocervical adenocarcinoma has increased annually, accounting for 25% of all cervical cancers.3 4

      Currently, there are some controversies and dilemmas regarding the diagnosis and treatment of endocervical adenocarcinoma.5 First, although cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma have a different histology, site of origin, and spread patterns, their staging is based on the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) staging system, which only considers factors such as tumor size, depth of invasion and horizontal spread. However, for endocervical adenocarcinoma, numerous studies have shown that it is very difficult to correctly diagnose invasive adenocarcinoma and accurately measure the depth of invasion, and the reproducibility of depth of invasion is poor, making it difficult to distinguish adenocarcinoma in situ from endocervical adenocarcinoma.6 Second, morphologically, endocervical adenocarcinoma is a group of heterogeneous tumors with different biological characteristics and prognosis, and the classification system of the WHO divides endocervical adenocarcinoma into more than 10 pathological types.7 However, for most endocervical adenocarcinoma, the guidelines recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) are radical surgery and nodal assessment, as well as intermediate-risk criteria, frequently referred to as Sedlis criteria, which are defined by a combination of lymphovascular space involvement, depth of stromal invasion, and tumor size.8 These do not offer different treatment options according to the types of pathology.

      Endocervical adenocarcinoma requires a different treatment strategy from cervical squamous cell carcinoma, and the management of endocervical adenocarcinoma is more complex.9 10 Therefore, it is crucial to raise awareness about endocervical adenocarcinoma, discover prognostic factors, and establish a unique prognostic evaluation system and specific surgical decision-making process.

      The Silva pattern-based classification system was proposed by Silva et al in 2013 and was further supplemented by Roma et al in 2016.11–13 This new classification system categorizes tumors based on their invasion patterns instead of using depth of invasion and horizontal spread. There is a close correlation between different patterns and tumor biological behaviors, and this new classification is more predictive of lymphovascular invasion and tumor recurrence than FIGO staging.11–13 According to 2024 NCCN,8 the Silva system is used for evaluating patterns of invasion in HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma and classifies them as patterns A, B, or C.

      There is currently a lack of comprehensive systematic reviews on this topic. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to evaluate the prognostic value of the Silva classification system in patients with HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma in order to guide future treatment.

      Methods

      Protocol Registration

      This meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.14 Before data extraction, the review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, Registration Number CRD 42023471368).

      Eligibility Criteria and Exclusion Criteria

      To be eligible, we aimed for the following inclusion criteria: (1) retrospective or prospective study design; (2) cases classified by Silva pattern-based classification and confirmed diagnosis of HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma or endocervical adenocarcinoma usual type; and (3) included articles assess at least one of the following parameters: death, recurrence, lymphovascular invasion or FIGO stage I.

      We excluded studies with the following criteria: (1) reviews, letters, case reports, or editorial comments; (2) studies without full text, insufficient data or low quality scores based on the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale15; and (3) republished literature or repetitive studies.

      Search Strategy

      Two researchers (MC and LH) conducted a comprehensive search in electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Central Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for relevant studies published from January 1, 2013 to March 21, 2024. The following search terms were used to identify relevant studies on cervical cancer: “cervical cancer”, “cancer of the uterine cervix”, “uterine cervical cancer”, whereas the following terms were used to identify relevant studies on Silva classification: “Silva”, “pattern”. The search was limited to English language publications. Two researchers (MC and LH) rigorously reviewed the reference lists of all the articles to identify any potentially missing studies or unpublished data. If multiple studies analyzed overlapping patient populations, we selected the most recent or comprehensive results. After the initial selection, the full texts of all potential articles were independently read by two researchers (MC and LH) for further evaluation. Disagreements between the authors were resolved through discussion with AZ.

      Data Extraction

      Data were extracted independently by two investigators (LH and YW) and disagreement was resolved through discussion with AZ. The relevant data included: author, date of publication, country, cases, Silva pattern-based classification, oncology outcomes (death, recurrence), pathological features (lymphovascular invasion, FIGO stage I). We attempted to acquire missing data by contacting the authors via email. However, no replies were received.

      Silva Pattern-based Classification

      According to this method, HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma can be classified based on their ‘pattern of invasion’ into three groups: A, B, and C (Box 1).12

      Box 1

      Silva pattern-based classification

      Pattern A

      Well-demarcated glands with rounded contours, frequently forming groups

      No single cells or desmoplastic stromal reaction

      Irrelevant relationship with large cervical vessels or depth of the tumor

      Complex intraglandular growth allowed (ie, cribriform, papillae)

      No lymphovascular invasion

      Well or moderate differentiation

      Pattern B

      Early destructive stromal invasion arising from well-demarcated glands (pattern A-like glands) ± lymphovascular invasion

      Pattern C

      Diffuse destructive invasion

      Oncology Outcomes

      Death was calculated from the date of surgery to either the last follow-up or the date of death. Recurrence was defined as either pathological proof of cancer or an imaging study showing the regrowth of the tumor, whether confined to the pelvic region or outside it.

      Pathological Features

      Lymphovascular invasion is defined as the presence of tumor cells within a definitive endothelial-lined space, which can be either lymphatics or blood vessels. For endocervical adenocarcinoma, FIGO stage I refers to cancer confined to the cervix without invading the connective tissue of the uterus or surrounding structures.

      Quality Assessment

      Two reviewers (MC) and (YC) independently assessed the quality of the included studies. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. All studies were assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale,15 which is based on three categories: selected cases, comparability between groups, and outcome assessment. The total Newcastle–Ottawa Scale score was 9 points, and a score of ≥6 was conisdered high-quality literature and included in the study.

      Statistical Analysis

      Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 17.0 software. Sub-group analyses were based on Silva pattern-based classification and heterogeneity was determined using the orthorhombic test and I2 statistic. If there was significant heterogeneity (p<0.05 or I2 >50%), a random-effects model was used. Otherwise, a fixed-effect model was used.16

      Results

      Study Selection and Characteristics

      The original search retrieved a total of 1589 relevant published studies from four databases (41 from PubMed, 262 from Embase, 217 from Central Cochrane Library, and 1069 from Web of Science). After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 68 studies were retained. Then, after evaluation of the remaining full-text articles, 49 studies were excluded. Finally, a total of 19 studies5 6 12 17–32 including 3122 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. A flowchart of the selection process is shown in Online Supplemental Figure S1.

      Supplemental material

      All studies were retrospective and all were awarded ≥7 points according to the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale criteria. The quality assessment of all studies is shown in Table 1 and the general characteristics of the studies included in this meta-analysis are summarized in Table 2.

      View this table:
      Table 1

      Quality assessment of included studies

      View this table:
      Table 2

      Basic characteristics of included studies

      Sub-group Analysis Based on Silva Pattern-based Classification

      Death

      This meta-analysis of 12 included studies5 6 12 17 20 21 25 27–30 32 showed that the combined death rate of HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma was positively correlated with Silva A (effect size 0.000, 95% CI 0.000 to 0.004, I2=0.000%, n=11), negatively correlated with Silva C (effect size 0.140, 95% CI 0.094 to 0.192, I2=80.265%, n=12), and had no significant correlation with Silva B (effect size 0.026, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.059, I2=52.809%, n=11) (see OnlineSupplementalFigure S2).

      Supplemental material

      Recurrence

      This meta-analysis of 14 included studies5 6 12 17–21 24–28 32 showed that the combined recurrence rate of HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma was positively correlated with Silva A (effect size 0.001, 95% CI 0.000 to 0.012, I2=0.000%, n=12), negatively correlated with Silva C (effect size 0.194, 95% CI 0.147 to 0.244, I2=72.047%, n=14), and had no significant correlation with Silva B (effect size 0.051, 95% CI 0.016 to 0.100, I2=64.107%, n=12) (see Online Supplemental Figure S3).

      Supplemental material

      Lymphovascular Invasion

      This meta-analysis of 16 included studies5 6 12 17–24 26 28 30–32 showed that the combined lymphovascular invasion rate of HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma was positively correlated with Silva A (effect size 0.000, 95% CI 0.000 to 0.005, I2=0.000%, n=13), negatively correlated with Silva C (effect size 0.588, 95% CI 0.501 to 0.673, I2=90.391%, n=16), and had no significant correlation with Silva B (effect size 0.210, 95% CI 0.169 to 0.254, I2=13.930%, n=13) (see Online Supplemental Figure S4).

      Supplemental material

      FIGO Stage I

      According to the eligibility studies, 13 studies5 6 12 17–20 22 24 26 30–32 reported the association between Silva pattern-based classification and FIGO stage I. Thus, we chose FIGO stage I as one of the pathological features in our study and found that the combined FIGO stage I rate of HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma was positively correlated with Silva A (effect size 0.993, 95% CI 0.976 to 1.000, I2=6.659%, n=12), negatively correlated with Silva C (effect size 0.824, 95% CI 0.749 to 0.889, I2=89.080%, n=12), and had no significant correlation with Silva B (effect size 0.937, 95% CI 0.864 to 0.987, I2=80.072%, n=11) (see Online Supplemental Figure S5).

      Supplemental material

      Discussion

      Summary of Main Results

      Our study indicated that patients with Silva A pattern tumors often have favorable outcomes, positively related with the oncology prognosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma, while those with Silva C tumors often have worse outcomes. Our study found no clear correlation between Silva C and the oncology prognosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma.

      Results in the Context of Published Literature

      This meta-analysis suggests that Silva A classification is associated with prognosis for endocervical adenocarcinoma. Roma et al11–13 reported that 21% of patients (73/352) had pattern A tumor, all stage I, and no recurrence. These results are consistent with previous studies.5 6 12 17 32 Genomic profiling studies have found that pattern A tumors tend to lack oncogenic changes, indicating that they may represent a less aggressive sub-set of endocervical adenocarcinoma or an early stage in tumor progression.33 These studies support the view that patients with Silva A tumors have a good prognosis. However, Feinberg et al34 described eight rare cases of ovarian metastases from pattern A endocervical adenocarcinoma and found a greater proportion (80%) of KRAS mutation in pattern A endocervical adenocarcinoma, which led them to think that certain gene mutations may be associated with a risk for ovarian metastases. However, the data are limited and more research is needed to understand the role of gene mutations in pattern A endocervical adenocarcinoma with metastases.

      Patients with Silva A endocervical adenocarcinoma often have favorable outcomes. If a pattern A tumor persists in the cone and the margins are negative, the patient may be managed with observation; if the tumor involves the surgical margins of the cone, a second cervical conization or wider excision could be necessary; if the margin of the second surgery shows a Silva B or C pattern, treatment should be followed based on the result of the second surgery. Moreover, according to this new system, one does not need to distinguish between adenocarcinoma in situ and pattern A endocervical adenocarcinoma as they undergo the same treatment and have an excellent prognosis,12 addressing the problem mentioned in some studies that a clear distinction between endocervical adenocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma in situ is not possible in up to 20% of cases.35 36

      We also found that Silva C classification was negatively associated with the prognosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma. Roma et al12 reported that 53.7% of patients (189/352) had a pattern C tumor, with 61.9% of patients showing evidence of lymphovascular invasion, 21.5% patients had recurrence, and 9.5% (18/189) died from the disease. These results were similar to those of other studies.5 6 12 17 32 However, Alvarado-Cabrero et al24 divided 189 patients with pattern C endocervical adenocarcinoma into six groups and found that not all pattern C endocervical adenocarcinoma had an aggressive behavior. Xu et al23 stratified pattern C tumors into four sub-groups and found that different growth patterns showed variations in the risk of lymphovascular invasion. A study based on genomic profiles reported that pattern B and pattern C tumors have multiple oncogenic mutations such as PIK3CA, KRAS, and ERBB2.33 Given these findings, it is recommended that patients with Silva C tumors, characterized by diffuse destructive stromal invasion, should undergo adjuvant treatment.12

      Our review of available studies suggests that there is no clear link to prognosis in patients with Silva B tumors, leading to more uncertainty in their treatment. Roma et al11–13 reported that only four of 90 patients with pattern B tumors had lymphovascular invasion. All patients had clinical stage I tumor and only one patient experienced a vaginal recurrence. Similar findings were reported in other studies,5 6 12 17 32 supporting the view that the Silva B classification is relatively uncertain. In addition, Sharma et al26 found that pattern B tumors with lymphovascular invasion clustered with pattern C, whereas pattern B tumors without lymphovascular invasion approached pattern A genotypically. They consolidate the Silva classification into low-risk (pattern A and pattern B without lymphovascular invasion) and high-risk (pattern B with lymphovascular invasion and pattern C) and found that high-risk tumors were enriched in mutations in PIK3CA, ATRX, and ERBB2.

      Thus, the characteristic of Silva B tumors is focal destructive stromal invasion, mainly from tumor glands of Silva A structure, with or without lymphovascular invasion. Therefore, on the basis of cold knife conization, loop electrosurgical excision, or cervical resection, lymph node sampling should be performed simultaneously. As suggested by Roma et al, if sentinel lymph nodes are positive or reassessed as Silva C, radical hysterectomy should be chosen and lymph node dissection and post-operative radiotherapy and chemotherapy should be performed as appropriate.12 Patients with reassessed pattern A only need follow-up.12

      The prognostic value of the Silva classification for HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma is controversial, with some studies showing a correlation with overall survival and disease-free survival while others report no correlation. Thus, further studies are warranted for investigating the correlation between the Silva pattern-based classification and HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma. According to Zeng et al,37 multivariate analysis showed that the Silva pattern system provided independent risk factors for prognosis. However, Li et al30 found that the Silva classification showed no correlation with overall survival and disease-free survival and concluded that it is helpful for selecting the appropriate operation before surgery but that its prognostic value requires further evaluation.

      In a prior study, Li et al29 concluded that the Silva classification system could predict the lymph node status and prognosis of HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma, but that it cannot be used alone as a guideline for treatment and prognosis and should be combined with the patient’s clinical stage and other high-risk factors. Therefore, based on Silva pattern-based classification, some researchers tried to establish new models to guide the treatment of HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma. Li et al32 presented a second-generation system called the Silva cumulative score, and provided evidence for its potential value to predict overall survival and disease-free survival in HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma. They suggested that the Silva cumulative score system could be useful for more precise therapeutic trials in HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma. Guo et al17 reported a Silva-based 4-factor model (Silva C, ≥3 cm, depth of stromal invasion >2/3, and >mild lymphovascular invasion) specifically for patients with intermediate-risk endocervical adenocarcinoma which has a superior recurrence prediction performance to the Sedlis criteria, so it may better guide post-operative adjuvant therapy.

      Strengths and Weaknesses

      To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to focus on the relationship between the Silva pattern-based classification and oncology prognosis, and pathological features of HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma. However, this study has several limitations. One potential weakness is that all the included studies were retrospective, which inherently comes with some limitations. Additionally, the included studies had varying follow-up periods, making it difficult to accurately analyze 5-year overall survival or disease-free survival. Furthermore, we only included studies conducted in English, which potentially introduces language bias into our findings.

      Implications for Practice and Future Research

      According to the Silva classification, patients with Silva A and B endocervical adenocarcinoma can avoid radical hysterectomy and those with a Silva A diagnosis can retain fertility. Therefore, we recommend adding the Silva classification to the pathological report of endocervical adenocarcinoma, which would have a significant impact on the treatment of young patients, particularly for women of reproductive age who require fertility preservation, and also to avoid overtreatment in patients with a good prognosis. However, since the Silva classification is still at a developmental stage, further prospective data and continued testing will be necessary to better facilitate its use in routine clinical practice in the future.

      Conclusion

      Based on the evidence provided, there is an association between prognostic value, pathological features, and the Silva A and C patterns of endocervical adenocarcinoma, while the association with the Silva B pattern remains uncertain. According to the treatment of the Silva pattern-based classification, it can reduce overtreatment and complications by assessing tumor cell growth patterns and creating personalized treatment plans for HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinoma. However, further prospective studies are needed to determine the oncological prognostic value and its impact on clinical decision-making.

      Data availability statement

      Data are available in a public, open access repository. In accordance with the journal’s guidelines, we will provide our data for independent analysis by a selected team by the Editorial Team for the purposes of additional data analysis or for the reproducibility of this study in other centers if such is requested.

      Ethics statements

      Patient consent for publication

      Ethics approval

      Not applicable.

      References

      1. ↵
        1. Bray F,
        2. Laversanne M,
        3. Sung HYA, et al
        . Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2024;74:229–63. doi:10.3322/caac.21834
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      2. ↵
        1. Eduardo MGDP,
        2. Campaner AB,
        3. Silva MALG
        . Apoptosis Phenomena in Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Adenocarcinomas of the Uterine Cervix. Pathol Oncol Res 2015;21:887–92. doi:10.1007/s12253-015-9906-y
        OpenUrl
      3. ↵
        1. Fang J,
        2. Zhang H,
        3. Jin S
        . Epigenetics and cervical cancer: from pathogenesis to therapy. Tumour Biol 2014;35:5083–93. doi:10.1007/s13277-014-1737-z
        OpenUrl
      4. ↵
        1. Park KJ
        . Cervical adenocarcinoma: integration of HPV status, pattern of invasion, morphology and molecular markers into classification. Histopathology 2020;76:112–27. doi:10.1111/his.13995
        OpenUrlPubMed
      5. ↵
        1. Wang W,
        2. Song G,
        3. Lin J, et al
        . Study of the revisited, revised, and expanded Silva pattern system for Chinese endocervical adenocarcinoma patients. Hum Pathol (N Y) 2019;84:35–43. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2018.08.029
        OpenUrl
      6. ↵
        1. Spaans VM,
        2. Scheunhage DA,
        3. Barzaghi B, et al
        . Independent validation of the prognostic significance of invasion patterns in endocervical adenocarcinoma: Pattern A predicts excellent survival. Gynecol Oncol 2018;151:196–201. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.09.013
        OpenUrlPubMed
      7. ↵
        1. Kurman RJ,
        2. Carcangiu ML,
        3. Herrington CS, et al
        . WHO Classification of Tumors of Female Reproductive Organs. 4. WHO Press, 2014.
      8. ↵
        1. Abu-Rustum NR,
        2. Yashar CM,
        3. Arend R, et al
        . NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2024. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023;21:1224–33. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2023.0062
        OpenUrl
      9. ↵
        1. Okonogi N,
        2. Murakami N,
        3. Ando K, et al
        . An Asian multi-national, multi-institutional, retrospective study on image-guided brachytherapy in cervical adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2022;14:311–20. doi:10.5114/jcb.2022.119451
        OpenUrl
      10. ↵
        1. Kim Y,
        2. Kim SI,
        3. Kim H, et al
        . Open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: A two-center retrospective cohort study with pathologic review of usual-type adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2022;167:28–36. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.08.003
        OpenUrl
      11. ↵
        1. De Vivar AD,
        2. Roma AA,
        3. Park KJ, et al
        . Invasive Endocervical Adenocarcinoma: Proposal for a New Pattern-based Classification System With Significant Clinical Implications: A Multi-institutional Study. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2013;32:592–601. doi:10.1097/PGP.0b013e31829952c6
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      12. ↵
        1. Roma AA,
        2. Mistretta T-A,
        3. Diaz De Vivar A, et al
        . New pattern-based personalized risk stratification system for endocervical adenocarcinoma with important clinical implications and surgical outcome. Gynecol Oncol 2016;141:36–42. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.02.028
        OpenUrlPubMed
      13. ↵
        1. Roma AA,
        2. Diaz De Vivar A,
        3. Park KJ, et al
        . Invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma: a new pattern-based classification system with important clinical significance. Am J Surg Pathol 2015;39:667–72. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000402
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      14. ↵
        1. Liberati A,
        2. Altman DG,
        3. Tetzlaff J, et al
        . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:e1–34. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      15. ↵
        1. Stang A
        . Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010;25:603–5. doi:10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      16. ↵
        1. Sedgwick P
        . Meta-analyses: what is heterogeneity? BMJ 2015;350:h1435. doi:10.1136/bmj.h1435
      17. ↵
        1. Guo C,
        2. Tao X,
        3. Zhang L, et al
        . A novel Silva pattern-based model for precisely predicting recurrence in intermediate-risk cervical adenocarcinoma patients. BMC Womens Health 2022;22:377. doi:10.1186/s12905-022-01971-z
      18. ↵
        1. Djordjevic B,
        2. Parra-Herran C
        . Application of a Pattern-based Classification System for Invasive Endocervical Adenocarcinoma in Cervical Biopsy, Cone and Loop Electrosurgical Excision (LEEP) Material: Pattern on Cone and LEEP is Predictive of Pattern in the Overall Tumor. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2016;35:456–66. doi:10.1097/PGP.0000000000000264
        OpenUrl
      19. ↵
        1. Devoto G,
        2. Bermudez A
        . Cervical adenocarcinoma: Clinical implications of the risk stratification system (Silva system). Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019:A74. doi:10.26226/morressier.5d2ee8e81e09a6f49485aa01
      20. ↵
        1. Byun JM,
        2. Cho HJ,
        3. Park HY, et al
        . Clinical significance of the pattern-based classification in endocervical adenocarcinoma, usual and variants. Int J Clin Oncol 2019;24:1264–72. doi:10.1007/s10147-019-01472-4
        OpenUrlPubMed
      21. ↵
        1. Wu D,
        2. Zhang L,
        3. Wu Y, et al
        . Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors for survival and lymph node metastases in stage IB adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Eur J Gynecol Oncol 2021;42:450. doi:10.31083/j.ejgo.2021.03.2300
        OpenUrl
      22. ↵
        1. Salvo G,
        2. Ramirez PT,
        3. Abu-Rustum NR, et al
        . Evaluation of a novel classification of cervical adenocarcinoma to predict pelvic lymph node status in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2019;154:270–1. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.04.629
        OpenUrl
      23. ↵
        1. Xu H,
        2. Pan H,
        3. Wang Y, et al
        . Expanded study on the risk of lymphovascular space invasion and lymph node metastasis of endocervical adenocarcinoma using Pattern Classification: a single-centre analysis of 213 cases. Pathol (Phila) 2019;51:570–8. doi:10.1016/j.pathol.2019.04.008
        OpenUrl
      24. ↵
        1. Alvarado-Cabrero I,
        2. Roma AA,
        3. Park KJ, et al
        . Factors Predicting Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis, Relapse, and Disease Outcome in Pattern C Endocervical Adenocarcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2017;36:476–85. doi:10.1097/PGP.0000000000000357
        OpenUrl
      25. ↵
        1. Stolnicu S,
        2. Boros M,
        3. Hoang L, et al
        . FIGO 2018 stage IB endocervical adenocarcinomas: an international study of outcomes informed by prognostic biomarkers. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021;31:177–84. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001893
        OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      26. ↵
        1. Sharma AE,
        2. Hodgson AJ,
        3. Howitt BE, et al
        . Molecular correlates of invasion pattern in HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma: emergence of two distinct risk-stratified tiers. Histopathology 2023;82:1067–78. doi:10.1111/his.14893
        OpenUrl
      27. ↵
        1. Rivera-Colon G,
        2. Chen H,
        3. Molberg K, et al
        . PD-L1 Expression in Endocervical Adenocarcinoma: Correlation With Patterns of Tumor Invasion, CD8+ Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes, and Clinical Outcomes. Am J Surg Pathol 2021;45:742–52. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000001633
        OpenUrl
      28. ↵
        1. Roma AA,
        2. Park KJ,
        3. Xie H, et al
        . Role of Lymphovascular Invasion in Pattern C Invasive Endocervical Adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2017;41:1205–11. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000822
        OpenUrlPubMed
      29. ↵
        1. Li J,
        2. Mu J,
        3. Li F, et al
        . Silva Classification System for HPV-Related EAC of Stage I ∼ IIIc1p Cervical Adenocarcinoma and Its Effect on Prognosis and Survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023;117:e526. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1801
      30. ↵
        1. Li Y,
        2. Jia M,
        3. Cao L, et al
        . Silva cumulative score and its relationship with prognosis in endocervical adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer 2022;22:22. doi:10.1186/s12885-022-10270-7
      31. ↵
        1. Stolnicu S,
        2. Barsan I,
        3. Hoang L, et al
        . Stromal invasion pattern identifies patients at lowest risk of lymph node metastasis in HPV-associated endocervical adenocarcinomas, but is irrelevant in adenocarcinomas unassociated with HPV. Gynecol Oncol 2018;150:56–60. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.570
        OpenUrlPubMed
      32. ↵
        1. Li X,
        2. Pang S,
        3. Shen Y, et al
        . Using Silva pattern system to predict prognosis and plan treatment of invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma: a single-center retrospective analysis. BMC Womens Health 2022;22:488. doi:10.1186/s12905-022-02090-5
      33. ↵
        1. Hodgson A,
        2. Amemiya Y,
        3. Seth A, et al
        . Genomic abnormalities in invasive endocervical adenocarcinoma correlate with pattern of invasion: biologic and clinical implications. Mod Pathol 2017;30:1633–41. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2017.80
        OpenUrlCrossRef
      34. ↵
        1. Feinberg J,
        2. Hodgson A,
        3. Abu-Rustum NR, et al
        . Clinical, Morphologic, and Molecular Features Associated With Ovarian Metastases From Pattern A Endocervical Adenocarcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol 2022;46:509–18. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000001845
        OpenUrl
      35. ↵
        1. Stolnicu S,
        2. Hoang L,
        3. Soslow RA
        . Recent advances in invasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Virchows Arch 2019;475:537–49. doi:10.1007/s00428-019-02601-0
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      36. ↵
        1. Ostör AG
        . Early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2000;19:29–38. doi:10.1097/00004347-200001000-00005
        OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      37. ↵
        1. Zeng C,
        2. Wu J-K,
        3. Lu X
        . Clinicopathological features and immunophenotype of Silva pattern system in endocervical adenocarcinoma. Int J Exp Pathol 2023;104:140–50. doi:10.1111/iep.12470
        OpenUrl

      Supplementary materials

      Footnotes

      • Contributors Study design: YC, YW. Literature search: YC, MC, YW. Manuscript drafting: YW, MC. Critical revision of the manuscript: YC, LH, YW, MC, AZ. Statistical analysis: LH, YC. Guarantor: MC. All authors have read and agreed with the published version of the manuscript.

      • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

      • Competing interests None declared.

      • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

      • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.