Article Text

Download PDFPDF
A randomized controlled trial on the oncologic outcomes of use of the intrauterine manipulator in the treatment of apparent uterine-confined endometrial carcinoma: the MANEC Trial
  1. Stefano Uccella1,
  2. Andrea Puppo2,
  3. Fabio Ghezzi3,
  4. Pier Carlo Zorzato1,
  5. Marcello Ceccaroni4,
  6. Vincenzo Dario Mandato5,
  7. Roberto Berretta6,
  8. Marco Camanni7,
  9. Renato Seracchioli8,
  10. Anna Myriam Perrone9,
  11. Vito Chiantera10,
  12. Giuseppe Vizzielli11,
  13. Giulio Sozzi12,
  14. Paolo Beretta13,
  15. Martin Steinkasserer14,
  16. Francesco Legge15,
  17. Guido Stevenazzi16,
  18. Giorgio Candotti17,
  19. Valentino Bergamini18,
  20. Francesco Fanfani19 and
  21. Simone Garzon1
    1. 1Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics, and Gynecology, AUOI Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
    2. 2Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
    3. 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Insubria - ASST Sette Laghi – Ospedale Filippo del Ponte, Varese, Italy
    4. 4Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Sacred Hearth Hospital Don Calabria, Negrar (Verona), Italy
    5. 5Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
    6. 6Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Parma, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
    7. 7Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Maria Vittoria, Torino, Italy
    8. 8Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S Orsola, Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
    9. 9Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS AOU Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
    10. 10Unit of Gynegologic Oncology, National Institute of Tumors IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
    11. 11Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Udine, University Hospital 'Santa Maria della Misericordia' - Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
    12. 12Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalù, Italy
    13. 13Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale 'Sant’Anna' - ASST Lariana, Como, Italy
    14. 14Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Sanitaria dell’Alto Adige, Bolzano, Italy
    15. 15Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Regional General Hospital 'F. Miulli', Acquaviva (Bari), Italy
    16. 16Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Nuovo di Legnano - ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano (Milan), Italy
    17. 17Unit of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
    18. 18Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology B, AOUI Verona, Verona, Italy
    19. 19UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Scienze Della Salute Della Donna, Del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, IRCCS - Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
    1. Correspondence to Prof. Stefano Uccella; stefano.uccella{at}univr.it

    Abstract

    Background The intrauterine manipulator used during a hysterectomy for endometrial cancer has been suggested as a reason for worsening oncologic outcomes. However, only a few non-randomized retrospective studies have investigated this association.

    Primary Objective(s) To compare 4-year recurrence-free survival in the group of patients who undergo hysterectomy using an intrauterine manipulator with that of those who undergo hysterectomy without it.

    Study Hypothesis Patients with endometrial cancer who undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy performed with an intrauterine manipulator would have a lower recurrence-free survival than patients who undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy without a manipulator.

    Trial Design Multicenter, parallel arm, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

    Major Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Adult women diagnosed with apparently uterine-confined endometrial cancer of any histology are eligible. We exclude women who had synchronous or previous (<5 years) invasive cancer, had a WHO performance score >2, and had inadequate baseline organ function.

    Primary Endpoint(s) 4-Year recurrence-free survival defined as any relapse or death related to endometrial cancer or treatment calculated from randomization to the date of the first recurrence-free survival event.

    Sample Size With an accrual time of 4 years, a minimum follow-up length of 4 years, and a two-sided type I error of 0.05, we need to enroll 515 women per arm to have a statistical power of 80% to reject the null hypothesis (HR for recurrence=1), assuming that patients who undergo hysterectomy with the use of the intrauterine manipulator have a 3-year recurrence rate of 12.5% and without the use of the intrauterine manipulator of 8.5% (HR for recurrence=1.50), and that 5% of patients are lost at follow-up in each arm, with a median time of 24 months.

    Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting Results Accrual completion is expected in 2028, and result presentation in 2032.

    Trial Registration ClinicalTrial.gov ID NCT05687084.

    • Endometrial Neoplasms
    • Hysterectomy
    • Surgical Procedures, Operative

    Data availability statement

    All data relevant to the study are included in the article.

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Data availability statement

    All data relevant to the study are included in the article.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • X @frafanfani

    • Contributors Conceptualization and study design: SU and SG; data curation: SU, SG, and PCZ; formal analysis: SU and SG; methodology: SU, SG, and PCZ; patient enrolment and data collection: all authors; supervision: SU and SG; writing - original draft: SG, PCZ, and SU; writing - review and editing: all authors; Guarantors: SU and SG.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.