Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Molecular biology as a driver in therapeutic choices for ovarian cancer
  1. Martina Arcieri1,
  2. Claudia Andreetta2,
  3. Veronica Tius3,
  4. Giulia Zapelloni3,
  5. Francesca Titone4,
  6. Stefano Restaino1,5 and
  7. Giuseppe Vizzielli1,3
    1. 1Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 'S. Maria della Misericordia' University Hospital, Azienda sanitaria universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
    2. 2Department of Medical Oncology, 'S. Maria della Misericordia' University Hospital, Azienda sanitaria universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy
    3. 3Medical Area Department (DAME), in Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy
    4. 4Department of Radiation Oncology, S. Maria della Misericordia' University Hospital, Azienda sanitaria universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy
    5. 5PhD School in Biomedical Sciences, Gender Medicine, Child and Women Health, University of Sassari, Sassari, Sardegna, Italy
    1. Correspondence to Dr Stefano Restaino, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "S. Maria della Misericordia" University Hospital, Azienda sanitaria universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Italy; restaino.stefano{at}gmail.com

    Abstract

    The majority of patients with ovarian cancer relapse within 3 years of first line chemotherapy. Therefore, choosing the most appropriate treatment in the recurrence setting has a fundamental role in defining a patient’s prognosis. Treatment options include systemic and intra-peritoneal chemotherapy, secondary cytoreductive surgery, and stereotactic body radiotherapy. The best therapeutic choice depends on multiple factors and not only on treatment-free interval. For systemic therapy, prior lines therapy, residual toxicities, comorbidities, performance status, and patient preferences should be taken into account. Secondary cytoreductive surgery can be proposed in patients in which complete tumor resectability can be predicted and in those with oligometastatic disease. Stereotactic body radiotherapy represents a valid alternative to surgery for oligometastatic disease with high local control and minimal toxicity. Current evidence has demonstrated an emerging role of BRCA mutational status and molecular profiling in the impacting response to systemic and local treatments. Therefore, these could provide guidance in the treatment decision process and help identify patients who respond better to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)-inhibitors or immunotherapy or to a combined approach with surgery rather than to platinum-based chemotherapy. Current knowledge in this field could help widen therapeutic options, especially for platinum-resistant patients. In this review, we offer an overview of the state of the art regarding the role of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery in this setting and their implications in clinical practice and in the treatment decision process, so as to provide the best tailored therapy in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

    • Ovarian Cancer
    • Cytoreduction surgical procedures
    • Medical Oncology
    • Radiation Oncology

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Footnotes

    • SR and GV contributed equally.

    • Contributors Conceptualization and supervision: AM, AC, FT, RS and VG. Writing—original draft preparation: AM, TV, AC, ZG, TF. Review and editing: AM, AC, VG. Supervision: RS, VG. Project administration: VG. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.