Article Text
Abstract
Cervical cancer is a major global health issue, ranking as the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. Depending on stage, histology, and patient factors, the standard management of cervical cancer is a combination of treatment approaches, including (fertility- or non-fertility-sparing) surgery, radiotherapy, platinum-based chemotherapy, and novel systemic therapies such as bevacizumab, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. While ambitious global initiatives seek to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem, the management of cervical cancer continues to evolve with major advances in imaging modalities, surgical approaches, identification of histopathological risk factors, radiotherapy techniques, and biomarker-driven personalized therapies. In particular, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has dramatically altered the treatment of cervical cancer, leading to significant survival benefits in both locally advanced and metastatic/recurrent settings. As the landscape of cervical cancer therapies continues to evolve, the aim of the present review is to provide a comprehensive discussion of the current state and the latest practice-changing updates in cervical cancer.
- Cervical Cancer
- Immunotherapy
- Radiotherapy
- SLN and Lympadenectomy
- Surgery
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
X @gcarusomd, @https://x.com/mattkwagar, @HsuMd, @oncohoegl, @guidoreyv, @AndreFernandes2, @Cucinella_G, @seda2211, @RParejaGineOnco, @pedroramirezMD
Contributors GCa: conceptualization, data curation, methodology, resources, validation, visualization, writing - original draft, writing - review and editing. MKW, H-CH, JH, GMRV, AF, GCu, SŞA, ASJ, JM: data curation, visualization, writing - original draft, writing - review and editing. RP, PTR: data curation, project administration, validation, supervision, writing - review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.