Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Copy number variations in endometrial cancer: from biological significance to clinical utility
  1. Erica Dugo1,
  2. Francesco Piva1,
  3. Matteo Giulietti1,
  4. Luca Giannella2 and
  5. Andrea Ciavattini2
    1. 1Department of Specialistic Clinical and Odontostomatological Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
    2. 2Woman’s Health Sciences Department, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
    1. Correspondence to Professor Francesco Piva, Department of Specialistic Clinical and Odontostomatological Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60020 Torrette, Ancona, Italy; f.piva{at}univpm.it

    Abstract

    The molecular basis of endometrial cancer, which is the most common malignancy of the female reproductive organs, relies not only on onset of mutations but also on copy number variations, the latter consisting of gene gains or losses. In this review, we introduce copy number variations and discuss their involvement in endometrial cancer to determine the perspectives of clinical applicability. We performed a literature analysis on PubMed of publications over the past 30 years and annotated clinical information, including histological and molecular subtypes, adopted molecular techniques for identification of copy number variations, their locations, and the genes involved. We highlight correlations between the presence of some specific copy number variations and myometrial invasion, lymph node metastasis, advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, high grade, drug response, and cancer progression. In particular, type I endometrial cancer cells have few copy number variations and are mainly located in 8q and 1q, while type II, high grade, and advanced FIGO stage endometrial cancer cells are aneuploid and have a greater number of copy number variations. As expected, the higher the number of copy number variations the worse the prognosis, especially if they amplify CCNE1, ERBB2, KRAS, MYC, and PIK3CA oncogenes. Great variability in copy number and location among patients with the same endometrial cancer histological or molecular subtype emerged, making them interesting candidates to be explored for the improvement of patient stratification. Copy number variations have a role in endometrial cancer progression, and therefore their detection may be useful for more accurate prediction of prognosis. Unfortunately, only a few studies have been carried out on the role of copy number variations according to the molecular classification of endometrial cancer, and even fewer have explored the correlation with drugs. For these reasons, further studies, also using single cell RNA sequencing, are needed before reaching a clinical application.

    • Endometrial Neoplasms
    • Carcinoma
    • Homologous recombination

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Footnotes

    • Contributors Conception and design: FP and AC. Collection and assembly of data: ED and MG. Data analysis and interpretation: ED and LG. Manuscript writing: all authors. Final approval of manuscript: all authors.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.