Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
PAZEC: a Dutch Gynaecological Oncology Group open-label, multicenter, phase II study of pazopanib in metastatic and locally advanced hormone-resistant endometrial cancer
  1. Anneke Westermann1,
  2. Petronella Ottevanger2,
  3. An Reyners3,
  4. Judith R Kroep4,
  5. Martijn G H Van Oijen5,
  6. Roy Lalisang6 and
  7. Petronella O Witteveen7
  1. 1Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2Dutch Gynaecological Oncology Group (DGOG) and Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  3. 3University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands
  4. 4DGOG and Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
  5. 5Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  6. 6Internal Medicine/Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  7. 7Department of Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to Dr Anneke Westermann, Department of Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam 1105, The Netherlands; a.m.westermann{at}amsterdamumc.nl

Abstract

Objective There is a continued need for improvement of second-line systemic treatment for metastatic and/or recurrent endometrial cancer.

Methods In this phase II, open-label study, eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed endometrial cancer, documented progressive disease, and a WHO performance status of ≤2. All participants received treatment with pazopanib 800 mg once daily until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 3 months, with secondary outcomes of overall response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. The study was powered to demonstrate 50% progression-free survival at 3 months with α=0.05 and β=80%.

Results Between January 2011 and February 2016, 60 eligible patients were included (intention-to-treat population). Median age was 68 (range, 53–85) years. Previous treatment included pelvic radiotherapy (58%), chemotherapy (90%), and hormonal therapy (43%). Three-month progression-free survival was 63.3% in the intention-to-treat population, with median progression-free survival and overall survival of 3.4 and 7.5 months, respectively. Overall response rate was 8.3%, and median follow-up 7.6 months. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were gastrointestinal toxicity in 21% of participants, including two patients with a gut perforation, one fatal gastrointestinal hemorrhage, one enterocutaneous fistula, and one fatal enterovaginal fistula. Extensive peritoneal disease existed in 80% of the patients with severe gastrointestinal toxicity. A definite correlation with previous radiotherapy could not be established.

Conclusions Pazopanib met its primary endpoint of 3 months’ progression-free survival in advanced endometrial cancer (63.3%), but response rates were modest. There may be a correlation for rare but severe gastrointestinal toxicity with previous treatments and/or disease site that has yet to be elucidated.

  • Endometrium
  • Endometrial Neoplasms

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors AW: guarantor, conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, visualization, writing - original draft, writing - review and editing. PO: conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, resources, writing - review and editing. AR: conceptualization, investigation, methodology, resources, writing - review and editing. JRK: conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, resources, writing - review and editing. MGHVO: data curation, formal analysis, validation, visualization, writing - review and editing. RL: conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, resources, writing - review and editing. POW: conceptualization, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, resources, writing - review and editing.

  • Funding This work was supported by Novartis.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.