Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Uterine smooth muscle tumors: a multicenter, retrospective, comparative study of clinical and ultrasound features
  1. Fulvio Borella1,
  2. Matteo Mancarella2,
  3. Mario Preti1,
  4. Luca Mariani2,
  5. Ilaria Stura3,
  6. Andrea Sciarrone4,
  7. Gianluca Bertschy1,
  8. Beatrice Leuzzi1,
  9. Elisa Piovano5,
  10. Giorgio Valabrega6,
  11. Margherita Turinetto6,
  12. Ida Pino7,
  13. Isabella Castellano8,
  14. Luca Bertero8,
  15. Paola Cassoni8,
  16. Stefano Cosma1,
  17. Dorella Franchi7 and
  18. Chiara Benedetto1
  1. 1Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science University Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  2. 2Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, Torino, Piemonte, Italy
  3. 3Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Piemonte, Italy
  4. 4AOU Città della salute e della Scienza di Torino, turin, Italy
  5. 5Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science University Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  6. 6Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
  7. 7Preventive Gynecology Unit, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milan, Italy
  8. 8Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, City of Health and Science University Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Dr Fulvio Borella, Surgical Sciences Gynecology and Obstetrics, Univeristy of Turin, Turin, Italy; fulvio.borella87{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objective To evaluate a wide range of clinical and ultrasound characteristics of different uterine smooth muscle tumors to identify features capable of discriminating between these types.

Methods This was a retrospective, multicenter study that included 285 patients diagnosed with uterine smooth muscle tumors (50 leiomyosarcomas, 35 smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential, and 200 leiomyomas). The patients were divided into three groups based on the histological type of their tumors, and the groups were compared according to the variables collected.

Results Leiomyosarcomas were more common in older and post-menopausal women. Compared with leiomyomas, smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential and leiomyosarcomas had similar ultrasound features such as absence of normal myometrium, multilocular appearance, hyper-echogenicity in case of uniform echogenicity, absence of posterior shadows, echogenic areas, and hyperechoic rim. Leiomyosarcomas were larger, had more cystic areas, and were associated with a higher prevalence of pelvic free fluid. Smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential were characterized by a higher frequency of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) type 6–7, the absence of internal shadows, and, in the case of cystic area, the presence of a regular internal wall. Tumor outline varied among the three histological types. A color score of 1 was typical of leiomyoma, a color score 2 was mainly observed in leiomyomas and smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential, a color score 3 did not differ among the tumors, while a color of score 4 was related to leiomyosarcomas. When combining color scores 3 and 4, leiomyosarcomas and smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential showed a high percentage of both circumferential and intra-lesional vascularization. A cooked appearance was not statistically different among the tumors.

Conclusions Based on our findings, specific ultrasonographic features as well as age and menopausal status are associated with different uterine smooth muscle tumor types. Integration of these data can help the pre-operative assessment of these lesions for proper management.

  • sarcoma
  • uterus
  • uterine neoplasms
  • uterine cancer

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors Guarantor: FB. Conceptualization: FB, DF, MM, CB. Original draft preparation: FB, MM, MP. Statistical analysis: IS, MP. Data collection from 4 different institutions and database construction: MT, GV, IP, GB, BL, EP. Senior sonographers who reviewed the images: SC, DF, LM. Data interpretation: FB, MM, AS, DF, LM, EP. Centralized pathological slides review: IC, LB. Resources: PC, AS. Funding acquisition: PC, MP, SC, CB. Writing – review and editing: all authors. DF and CB are joint last authors.

  • Funding The present study was supported by grants from “Rete Oncologica del Piemonte e Valle d’Aosta” and “Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Torino” (File Number: 2021.0553).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.