Article Text
Abstract
Objective Anemia is prevalent in patients with gynecologic cancers and is associated with increased peri-operative morbidity. We aimed to characterize risk factors for pre-operative anemia and describe outcomes among patients undergoing surgery by a gynecologic oncologist to identify potential areas for impactful intervention.
Methods We analyzed major surgical cases performed by a gynecologic oncologist in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2014 to 2019. Anemia was defined as hematocrit <36%. Demographic characteristics and peri-operative variables for patients with and without anemia were compared using bivariable tests. Odds of peri-operative complications in patients stratified by pre-operative anemia were calculated using logistic regression models.
Results Among 60 017 patients undergoing surgery by a gynecologic oncologist, 23.1% had pre-operative anemia. Women with ovarian cancer had the highest rate of pre-operative anemia at 39.7%. Patients with advanced-stage cancer had a higher risk of anemia than early-stage disease (42.0% vs 16.3%, p≤0.001). In a logistic regression model adjusting for potential demographic, cancer-related, and surgical confounders, patients with pre-operative anemia had increased odds of infectious complications (odds ratio (OR) 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.26), thromboembolic complications (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.68), and blood transfusion (OR 5.78, 95% CI 5.34 to 6.26).
Conclusions There is a high rate of anemia in patients undergoing surgery by a gynecologic oncologist, particularly those with ovarian cancer and/or advanced malignancy. Pre-operative anemia is associated with increased odds of peri-operative complications. Interventions designed to screen for and treat anemia in this population have the potential for significant impact on surgical outcomes.
- Ovarian Cancer
- Preoperative Care
- Surgery
- Postoperative complications
Data availability statement
Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. These data are available to NSQIP-participating institutions.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. These data are available to NSQIP-participating institutions.
Footnotes
Contributors OF contributed to the conceptualization of the work, methodology, formal data analysis, data curation, writing of the original draft, and is the guarantor. BV contributed to project administration and data curation as well as review and editing of the manuscript. DR, EH, HM, and ET contributed to the acquisition of data and review and editing of the manuscript. EB contributed to the conceptualization of the work, formal analysis, supervision, and review and editing of the manuscript. All authors are in agreement with its submission for publication to IJGC.
Funding This study was funded by GOG Foundation and National Institute on Aging (1P30AG059988-01a1)
Competing interests ELB received career development funds from the GOG Foundation and the National Institute on Aging (NIA) (1P30AG059988-01a1).
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.