Article Text

Download PDFPDF

ECO-LEAK technique: early detection of colorectal anastomotic leakage by transvaginal ultrasound
Free
  1. Victor Lago1,2,
  2. Manel Montesinos-Albert1,
  3. Blanca Segarra-Vidal1,
  4. Susana Martínez Cuenca1,
  5. Juan José Hidalgo1,
  6. Pablo Padilla-Iserte1,
  7. Blanca Ferri1,
  8. Irene Juarez1 and
  9. Santiago Domingo1
  1. 1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
  2. 2CEU Cardenal Herrera University, Valencia, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Dr Victor Lago, Gynecologic oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain; victor.lago.leal{at}hotmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Modified posterior pelvic exenteration or colorectal resection followed by an end-to-end colorectal anastomosis are common procedures during cytoreduction.1 Anastomotic leak represents a clinical challenge that delays patients’ recovery and oncologic treatment, with a direct negative impact on overall prognosis and survival.1 The overall anastomotic leak rate after ovarian cancer surgery is 5.3%.2 Some risk factors, such as advanced age, multiple bowel resections, low serum albumin level, and a short distance from the anastomosis to the anal verge, have been associated with increased incidence of anastomotic leak.1 3 Different tests can be used to diagnose leak during the post-operative period, like CT-enema or proctoscopy.4 Nevertheless, there is no published evidence about the use of ultrasound for this purpose and its role is still to be established.

In order to diagnose the presence of anastomotic leakage in female patients after colorectal anastomosis, we devised this diagnostic test (ECO-LEAK) during the postoperative period.

The ECO-LEAK test is performed in the following sequence, after informing the patient and obtaining her consent. The patient is placed in a gynecological position (lithotomy). Then basal transvaginal ultrasound is performed with the aim of describing the presence or absence of free fluid or other ultrasound findings (sagittal and transverse scan). Simultaneously, a Foley catheter is introduced through the anus, filling the ballon under direct visualization. Next, transvaginal ultrasound with enema is performed by the instillation of 180 cc of serum under ultrasound vision with the probe in the vagina and sagittal and mid-sagittal exploration. If no new free peri-anastomotic/pelvic fluid appears, the test is considered negative. If there is a new appearance of pelvic free fluid (previously absent) or an increase in free peri-anastomotic/pelvic fluid with respect to the baseline examination (fluid present at the beginning of the examination), the test is considered positive.

In conclusions, anastomotic leak can occur despite a normal intra-operative anastomosis check-up. Transvaginal ultrasound associated with a rectal enema (ECO-LEAK) performed during the post-operative period might represent a useful tool for anastomotic leak diagnosis. A prospective study is needed to determine its accuracy.

Figure 1

Normal ultrasound view of colorectal anastomosis.

Video 1 .

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Ethics approval

Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

References

Footnotes

  • Twitter @BSegarraVidal

  • Contributors All the authors (VL, MM-A, BS-V, SMC, JJH, PP-I, BF, IJ, SD) of the present manuscript declare that there are no conflicts of interest and have actively participated in the work providing input including: (1) substantial contributions to conception and study design(VL, MM-A, BS-V, SMC, JJH, PP-I, BF, IJ, SD); (2) drafting of the article (VL, MM-A, SD); (3) final approval of the version to be published (VL, MM-A, SD).

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.