Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF

Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer
  1. Ariel Glickman1,
  2. Berta Díaz-Feijoo1,2,
  3. Nuria Agusti1,
  4. Núria Carreras-Dieguez1,
  5. Pere Fusté1,2 and
  6. Aureli Torné1,2
  1. 1Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut Clínic de Ginecologia Obstetrícia i Neonatologia, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
  2. 2Universitat de Barcelona, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Dr Aureli Torné, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Institut Clínic de Ginecologia Obstetrícia i Neonatologia, 08021 Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain; atorne{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The role of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer has been questioned1 since the publication of the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial results. However, it is likely that the lower survival rates shown in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) arm were not directly related to the MIS itself, but rather to technical procedures linked to laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches. These include the use of uterine manipulators or the opening of the vagina through the abdominal cavity.2

Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LARVH) or Coelio-Schauta procedure combines lymph node staging and pelvic space creation by laparoscopy with radical hysterectomy including parametrium-paracolpium resection performed predominantly by vaginal approach, as reported by Schauta. This technique has shown oncological results and surgical complications comparable with those reported for the open surgery arm of the LACC trial.3 During LARVH, colpotomy and closure of the vagina are performed at the beginning of the radical hysterectomy, precluding manipulation of the tumor during the procedure.

We present a step-by-step video demonstration of the LARVH technique as it has been performed for more than 25 years at Hospital Clinic of Barcelona following the surgical technique described by Dargent and Querleu to treat early-stage cervical cancer patients.4 This is a 37 year-old patient diagnosed with a 3.5 cm squamous cervical cancer, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB2, who underwent a LARVH. The procedure started by laparoscopic sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy using a hybrid tracer (technetium 99 m labeled nanocolloid plus indocyanine green) since prior validation of this technique had been performed in our institution from 2001 to 2011. Intraoperative pathology ruled out SLN metastasis. After full development of both paravesical and pararectal spaces, ureters were dissected until the ureteric tunnel and uterine arteries were sectioned at their origin. Round and utero-ovarian ligaments were sectioned and vesical peritoneal reflection opened, moving the bladder aside. Afterwards, vaginal time was performed following Schauta’s technique and incorporating an advanced bipolar device, that allows tissue sealing and cutting. Operative time was 5 hours (vaginal time 1.5 hours) including total anesthetic time. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications, and the hospital stay was 2 days.

Coelio-Schauta is a minimally invasive technique that adheres to the oncologic principle of tumor containment. It should be included in prospective randomized trials to clarify the role of MIS in early-stage cervical cancer.

Figure 1

Final specimen shows the vaginal cuff and parametria resected.

Video 1 LARVH in early-stage cervical cancer

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Ethics approval

Not applicable.



  • Contributors AG: Accepts full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish. Conceptualization, video editing, surgery, and writing original draft. NC-D: Conceptualization, video editing, surgery, and writing original draft. PF: Conceptualization, project administration, surgery, and writing review. NA: Conceptualization, surgery, and writing review. AT, B-DF: conceptualization, project administration, surgery and video recording and editing, supervision, and writing review. AT: guarantor for the overall content.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.