Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Loop colostomy formation with a skin bridge technique in a gynecological oncology center
Free
  1. Robert Adam Farrell1,
  2. Patrick J Maguire1,
  3. Celine Ovaere1,
  4. Iman Khamayseh1 and
  5. Feras Abu Saadeh1,2
  1. 1Gynaecology Oncology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  2. 2Trinity College Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Feras Abu Saadeh, Department of Gynaecology Oncology, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; ferasabusaadeh{at}dubgyn.org

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Our objective was to demonstrate formation of loop colostomy, secured using a skin bridge technique, as part of emergency bowel diversion in a gynecological oncology center. Using videography, we have demonstrated the selection of a segment of large bowel and the maturing of a loop colostomy on the abdominal wall, secured using a skin bridge technique as part of the emergency management of a bowel perforation 7 days after total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophrectomy and omentectomy.

A step-by-step process, accompanied by intraoperative videography, is presented. The stoma site is prepared with dissection of the skin bridge tissue followed by division of the bridge to allow the bowel loop to pass through. The abdomen is entered through the same incision and a section of colon is brought out through a cruciate rectus sheath incision to form the loop stoma. When the bowel loop is positioned, the skin bridge is passed through a mesenteric window and is secured with a 2–0 polydioxanone mattress suture. After routine abdominal closure and wound dressing, the bowel loop is incised to complete stoma formation and the mucosal edges are secured to the skin with 3–0 poligleaprone (monocryl) sutures.

Skin bridge loop stoma formation compares favorably with fashioning of the stoma over a synthetic rod removed on postoperative days 7–10. The glass or plastic prosthesis interferes with the fitting of the stoma plate, and increases peristomal complications.1 We have previously demonstrated that patients with stomas secured with skin bridge techniques had decreased delays to stoma self-care.2 In the largest series comparing 45 skin bridge and rod loop stomas, skin bridge use was associated with significantly reduced inflammatory skin complications and improved quality of life.3 The long term support offered by the skin bridge technique is of particular interest in gynecologic oncology where disease progression may lead to mesenteric shortening and late stomal retraction.

Skin bridge loop stoma formation (Figure 1) is safe and feasible for both emergency and elective bowel diversion, where it provides for more rapid stoma self-care and reduced complications postoperatively.

Figure 1

Satisfactory formation of a loop colostomy secured with the skin bridge technique; skin markings for alternate site are visible cranially.

Video 1

Disclaimer: this video summarises a scientific article published by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ). The content of this video has not been peer-reviewed and does not constitute medical advice. Any opinions expressed are solely those of the contributors. Viewers should be aware that professionals in the field may have different opinions. BMJ does not endorse any opinions expressed or recommendations discussed. Viewers should not use the content of the video as the basis for any medical treatment. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content.

Data availability statement

There are no data in this work.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Ethics approval

This study involves human participants but was not approved. This submission does not include patient identifiable information. Material used in this submission was collected with the patient’s written informed consent for collection and publication in an academic journal, and has been fully anonymized in this submission.

References

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors made a substantial contribution to the conception and design of the video, and writing and editing of this article. Each has contributed to drafting the video or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and has approved the final submitted video and article. AS acts as guarantor of this article.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.