Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size &lt;2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dimitrios Nasioudis; Benjamin B Albright; Emily M Ko; Ashley F Haggerty; Robert L Giuntoli II; Sarah H Kim; Mark A Morgan; Nawar A Latif

doi:10.1136/ijgc-2021-002505

Citation Tools

other Versions

You are currently viewing an earlier version of this article (January 10, 2022).
View the most recent version of this article

Original research

Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size <2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

BibTeX
Bookends
EasyBib
EndNote (tagged)
EndNote 8 (xml)
Medlars
Mendeley
Papers
RefWorks Tagged
Ref Manager
RIS
Zotero

Cite this article as:: Nasioudis D, Albright BB, Ko EM, et al

Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size <2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis

International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer Published Online First: 20 May 2021. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002505

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

other Versions

Download to a citation manager

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password