Comparative study of three different managements after colorectal anastomosis in ovarian cancer: conservative management, diverting ileostomy, and ghost ileostomy

Victor Lago; Amalia Sanchez-Migallón; Blas Flor; Pablo Padilla-Iserte; Luis Matute; Álvaro García-Granero; Marcos Bustamante; Santiago Domingo

doi:10.1136/ijgc-2019-000538

Citation Tools

other Versions

You are currently viewing an earlier version of this article (July 10, 2019).
View the most recent version of this article

Original Article

Comparative study of three different managements after colorectal anastomosis in ovarian cancer: conservative management, diverting ileostomy, and ghost ileostomy

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

BibTeX
Bookends
EasyBib
EndNote (tagged)
EndNote 8 (xml)
Medlars
Mendeley
Papers
RefWorks Tagged
Ref Manager
RIS
Zotero

Cite this article as:: Lago V, Sanchez-Migallón A, Flor B, et al

Comparative study of three different managements after colorectal anastomosis in ovarian cancer: conservative management, diverting ileostomy, and ghost ileostomy

International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer Published Online First: 10 July 2019. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000538

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

other Versions

Download to a citation manager

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password