Article Text

Download PDFPDF
EV249/#926  The real-world use of first-line maintenance treatment regimens among patients with advanced ovarian cancer varies by biomarker status: results from the Europa study
  1. Anna Fagotti1,
  2. Elena Braicu2,
  3. Jean-Sebastien Frenel3,
  4. Mathilde Saint-Ghislain4,
  5. Marina Wirtz5,
  6. Jonathan Lim6,
  7. Tirza Boyle6,
  8. Barbara Mascialino7,
  9. Kellyn Arnold8,
  10. Elena Chaparova9,
  11. Catherine Hogg8,
  12. Amanda Golembesky10 and
  13. Giovanni Scambia11
  1. 1Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy
  2. 2Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  3. 3Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Nantes, France
  4. 4Institut Curie, Paris, France
  5. 5Zentrum für Ambulante Gynäkologische Onkologie, Krefeld, Germany
  6. 6GSK, Upper Providence, USA
  7. 7GSK, Verona, Italy
  8. 8IQVIA, Londa, UK
  9. 9IQVIA, Sofia, Bulgaria
  10. 10GSK, Durham, USA
  11. 11Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

Abstract

Introduction In Europe, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) approvals for advanced ovarian cancer (aOC) are for biomarker-specific patient populations. It is not known how these treatment label variations are reflected in real-world PARPi use. This real-world study describes clinical and tumor characteristics of patients with aOC who received a PARPi-containing first-line maintenance (1LM) treatment in France, Germany, and Italy.

Methods In this ongoing, multicenter, retrospective study, patients with epithelial aOC who initiated PARPi-containing 1LM treatment (01Oct2018 to 31Mar2023) were included. Characteristics at 1LM treatment initiation were described overall and separately for those who received niraparib monotherapy or olaparib-bevacizumab. Characteristics are presented for all countries, but treatment and biomarker testing data are pending for Germany.

Results Among 580 patients (Italy, 307; France, 141; Germany, 132), median age was 61 years (IQR, 53–70), 93.6% had high-grade serous tumors, 70.3% had stage III disease, and 87.2% had an ECOG PS score of 0–1. Among patients in France and Italy (table 1), 167 received niraparib monotherapy, and 82 received olaparib-bevacizumab. All patients underwent BRCA testing, but more homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing was conducted for patients receiving olaparib-bevacizumab (73.2%) than niraparib (20.4%). Of patients who received niraparib, 98.8% were BRCAwt. Of patients who received olaparib-bevacizumab, 95.1% were BRCA-mutated or BRCAwt and homologous recombination deficient.

Conclusion/Implications Among patients with aOC, the 1LM treatment patients received differed by HRD testing and biomarker status. Given the established prognostic value of BRCA/HRD status, these results emphasize the importance of considering biomarker status when evaluating real-world outcomes across 1LM treatment regimens.

Abstract EV249/#926 Table 1

Biomarker characteristics for patients receiving 1LM niraparib monotherapy or olaparib-bevacizumab treatment from Italy and France

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.