Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the ovary: a review of 63 cases
  1. Alejandra Flores Legarreta1,
  2. Reem Saab1,
  3. Naomi R Gonzales1,
  4. Gary B Chisholm1,
  5. Shannon N Westin1,
  6. R Tyler Hillman1,2 and
  7. Michael Frumovitz1
  1. 1 Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
  2. 2 Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Michael Frumovitz, Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; mfrumovitz{at}mdanderson.org; Dr Alejandra Flores Legarreta; aflegarreta{at}mdanderson.org

Abstract

Objective To describe the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of ovarian neuroendocrine neoplasms from a curated registry.

Methods This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients in our registry with confirmed ovarian neuroendocrine neoplasms. We excluded patients with small cell carcinoma not otherwise specified, small cell hypercalcemic type, and those with neuroendocrine ‘features’ or ‘differentiation.’ Clinicopathological characteristics were described in two separate groups: patients with carcinoid tumors and patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas. Progression-free and overall survival were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator in these two groups, and multivariable analysis was done to identify predictors of survival for neuroendocrine carcinomas only.

Results A total of 63 patients met inclusion criteria, 13 (21%) with carcinoid tumors and 50 (79%) with neuroendocrine carcinomas. In the carcinoid tumor group, one patient (8%) was misdiagnosed. Two patients (15%) had a recurrence and the 5-year overall survival rate was 80% (95% CI 45% to 100%), with a lower bound of the median survival of 4.8 years (95% CI). In the neuroendocrine carcinoma group, 23 patients (46%) were misdiagnosed, 16 of whom (69%) received therapy with the presumption of a non-neuroendocrine carcinoma diagnosis. Thirty patients (60%) had a recurrence, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 24% (10%, 38%), with a median survival of 1.6 years (1.3, 3.3). Patients with carcinomas stage III or IV had an increased risk of progression/recurrence (HR=5.6; 95% CI 1.9 to 17.0) and death (HR=8.1; 95% CI 2.2 to 29.7) compared with those with stage I or II. Pure histology was associated with an increased risk of progression/recurrence (HR=2.3; 95% CI 1.0 to 5.2) compared with admixed histology.

Conclusion Most patients had neuroendocrine carcinomas, which were associated with a higher recurrence rate and worse survival than carcinoid tumors. A high proportion of patients in both groups were initially misdiagnosed, and a new association with endometrial hyperplasia was observed. Neuroendocrine admixed histology is associated with a higher risk of progression.

  • Neuroendocrine Tumors
  • Ovarian Cancer
  • Paraneoplastic Syndromes
  • Ovarian Neoplasms

Data availability statement

No data are available.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Twitter @Shannon.Westin, @RTylerHillmanMD, @frumovitz

  • Contributors AFL and MF: idea. AFL and MF: manuscript conceptualization and writing. AFL and MF: critical revision and editing. GBC: statistics. NRRG, RS, SNW, RTH: revision and editing of drafts and final version of manuscript. All authors have given their final approval of this version and all authors accept responsibility for its contents. MF is responsible for the overall content as guarantor.

  • Funding This study was supported by the National Cancer Institute under award number P30CA016672, which supports the MD Anderson Cancer Center Clinical Trials Office.

  • Competing interests RTH has a sponsored research agreement with Sumitomo Pharma Inc, which is unrelated to this manuscript. Michael Frumovitz has research support from AkesoBio and is a speaker/consultant for Stryker. The remaining authors have no competing interests.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Author note CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research (RTH).