Article Text
Abstract
The impact of surgery on the surgeon’s well-being encompasses both physical and psychological aspects. Physically, surgeons are at risk of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms due to the nature of their work, and this risk can be impacted by theater environment, equipment design, and workload. Many symptoms will be self-limiting, but work related musculoskeletal symptoms can lead to the development of an injury, which can have far reaching effects, including the need for medical or surgical treatment, time away from work, or a change in clinical duties. Additionally, surgery can place a significant cognitive workload on the lead operator and this can be exacerbated, or alleviated, by the surgical environment, experience of the assistance, surgical modality, and case complexity. Measuring and quantifying the impact of surgery on the surgeon is a challenging undertaking. Tools such as motion capture, physiological markers, including heart rate variability and salivary cortisol, and questionnaires can provide insights into understanding the overall impact of surgery on the surgeon. A holistic approach that incorporates injury prevention strategies, communication, and support, is vital in assessing and mitigating risk factors. Injury prevention assessment tools and interventions that can be used within the busy surgical environment are needed, alongside increased ergonomic awareness. Addressing the impact of surgery on the surgeon is a multifaceted challenge, and long term positive changes can only be sustained with the support of the whole surgical team and healthcare organizations by developing and maintaining a supportive working environment.
- Surgery
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @DrEstherMoss1
Contributors All authors contributed to the first draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The research was carried out at the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC).
Competing interests ELM has received research grants from Intuitive Surgical to undertake the ISSUE study, and grants for unrelated research from the British Gynaecological Cancer Society and Hope Against Cancer. AA has been funded by Intuitive Surgical to undertake the ISSUE study.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.