Article Text
Abstract
Objective To review rates of uterine preservation and gonadal function, surgical outcomes, and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing surgical uterine transposition.
Methods A structured search and analysis of the published literature on uterine transposition was conducted. Information on study type, sample size, patient characteristics, clinical indications, details of the surgical technique, trans-operative and post-operative results, success rates in preserving reproductive organ function and fertility were extracted.
Results A total of 18 cases were reported to date. Patients’ median age was 29 (range 3–38) years. Rectal cancers accounted for 9 (50%) cases of published cases of uterine transposition, followed by 6 (33%) cervical squamous cell carcinomas, 1 (6%) vaginal squamous cell carcinoma, 1 (6%) sacral yolk sac tumor, and 1 (6%) pelvic liposarcoma. The median time for uterine transposition to the upper abdomen was 150 (range 80–360) min, and 90 (range 80–310) min for organ reimplantation in the pelvis. Cervical ischemia occurred in 5 (27.8%) cases, being the most commonly reported complication. The median follow-up time was 25 months, and three patients achieved spontaneous pregnancies resulting in successful gestations, out of five patients who were reported as having tried. One patient experienced recurrence and succumbed to the tumor during treatment.
Conclusions Uterine transposition is a feasible and safe surgical approach that offers patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy an option to preserve gonadal and uterine function, with the potential for spontaneous pregnancy.
- Cervical Cancer
- Colorectal Neoplasms
- Radiotherapy
- Uterus
- Postoperative complications
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Twitter @glaucobaiocchi, @leitaomd
Contributors RR and CNC contributed to conceptualization, data collection, data analysis, writing the original draft of manuscript, and reviewing and editing the manuscript. RR, GB, AO, ML contributed to study planning, data analysis, reviewing, and final editing the manuscript. All authors had access to the data reported in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.