Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Objective The tumor immune microenvironment in ovarian clear cell carcinoma has not been clearly defined. We analyzed the immunological changes from treatment-naive to recurrence to correlate them with clinical outcomes.
Method We compared the changes in immune infiltration of advanced-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma samples before treatment and at the time of recurrence via immunohistochemistry (Programmed Cell Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8+), forkhead box P3 (Foxp3+)), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), and next-generation sequencing (54 patients). We analyzed the association between platinum sensitivity status and tumor immune microenvironment.
Results Immunohistochemistry revealed significantly increased PD-L1 (p=0.048) and CD8+T cells (p=0.022) expression levels after recurrence. No significant differences were observed in TIL density or Foxp3+T cells. There was no significant correlation between TIL, PD-L1, CD8+T cell, and Foxp3+T cell levels in treatment-naive tumors and survival outcomes. The most common genomic alterations were PIK3CA (41.7%) and ARID1A (41.7%) mutations. There were no differences in the immunological changes or survival outcomes according to PIK3CA and ARID1A mutations. Patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive disease showed higher TIL expression levels. There were no significant differences in PD-L1, CD8+T cells, or Foxp3+T cells between platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant diseases.
Conclusion We characterized the tumor immune microenvironment in patients with advanced-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma. PD-L1 and CD8+T cell expression significantly increased after recurrence. Whether this could be used to select patients for immunotherapy in the recurrence setting should be investigated.
- Ovarian Cancer
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.
Footnotes
Contributors HYW: Conceptualization, methodology, writing–original draft. NYK: Methodology. JJ: Methodology. JYL: Conceptualization, writing– review and editing. EJN: Investigation. SWK: Investigation. SHK: Methodology. YTK: Methodology. YJL: Conceptualization, methodology, writing– review and editing. YJL accepts full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish as a guarantor.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.