Article Text

Download PDFPDF

EP283/#752  Real-world effectiveness of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus gemcitabine in platinum-resistant/refractory recurrent ovarian cancer
Free
  1. Chuenkamon Charakorn1,
  2. Tarinee Manchana2,
  3. Sukanya Siriyotha3,
  4. Ammarin Thakkinstian3,
  5. Suwicha Chittithaworn1,
  6. Shina Oranratanaphan2,
  7. Navamol Lekskul1,
  8. Krissada Paiwattananupant1,
  9. Natacha Phoolcharoen2,
  10. Pinyada Panyavaranant2,
  11. Lukkana Promwattanaphan1,
  12. Wilasinee Areeruk2,
  13. Chompunoot Kongsawatvorakul1,
  14. Sikarn Satitniramai1,
  15. Panida Panida Mathaveechotikul1 and
  16. Arb-Aroon Lertkhachonsuk1
  1. 1Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bangkok, Thailand
  2. 2Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bangkok, Thailand
  3. 3Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Bangkok, Thailand

Abstract

Introduction Non-platinum chemotherapy agents are often given in platinum-resistant/refractory recurrent ovarian cancer (PRROC) treatment. This large cohort study aimed to compare the effectiveness between pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and gemcitabine, which are 2 most common second-line chemotherapy agents in Thailand.

Methods All epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients treated at two tertiary cancer centers during 2009–2018 were enrolled. PRROC patients were included and their treatments were reviewed. The effectiveness of PLD and gemcitabine was compared using the treatment-effect model.

Results Of 1,708 EOC patients, 954 patients developed recurrence and 530 patients (55.6%) diagnosed as PRROC. The most common second-line chemotherapy regimen was PLD (251 patients, 47.4%), followed by gemcitabine (217 patients, 40.1%), and other (62 patients, 12.5%). After applying the treatment effect model by Inverse Probability Weighting with Regression Adjustment (IPWRA), the median time of disease progression after treatment with PLD, and gemcitabine was 6.3 months (5.4 to 7.1), and 6.7 months (5.2 to 8.2), respectively. The average treatment effect (ATE) or the difference of median time of disease progression between both agents was not statistically significant. Whereas the median time from PRROC diagnosis until death after treatment with PLD and gemcitabine was 22.5 months (17.7 to 27.4), and 17.6 months (15.0 to 20.3), respectively. The ATE indicated that PLD had 4.9 months (-0.5 to 10.4) longer than gemcitabine, although there was no statistical significance.

Conclusion/Implications PLD and gemcitabine had comparable effectiveness for PRROC treatment. The median time from PRROC diagnosis until death after treatment with PLD tended to be 4.9 months longer than gemcitabine.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.