Article Text

Download PDFPDF

EP142/#1526  Study on the effectiveness of using artificial intelligence image recognition system to diagnose endometrial cytopathology
  1. Jing An1,
  2. Panyue Yin1,
  3. Bin Wang2,
  4. Guizhi Shi3,
  5. Dexing Zhong4,
  6. Jianliu Wang5 and
  7. Qiling Li6
  1. 1The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xi’an, China
  2. 2Xi’an Daxing Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xi’an, China
  3. 3Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, Beijing, China
  4. 4Xi’an Jiaotong University, School of Automation Science and Engineering, Xi’an, China
  5. 5Peking University People’s Hospital, Gynecology and Obstetrics, Beijing, China
  6. 6First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xi’an, China

Abstract

Introduction To explore the effectiveness of an image recognition system based on artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing benign and malignant endometrial cell clumps.

Methods Endometrial cytological specimens from the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University and Xi’an Daxing Hospital from August 2021 to February 2023 were selected, and histopathology was used as the gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of AI image recognition system (AI diagnosis) and professional pathologists’ manual diagnosis (manual diagnosis) of benign and malignant endometrial cell clumps were compared and analyzed.

Results Among the 126 patients included in the analysis, the overall coincidence rate of AI diagnosis and histological diagnosis was 92.1% (116/126), which was highly consistent with histopathological results (Kappa=0.841); the overall coincidence rate of manual diagnosis and histological diagnosis was 94.4% (119/126), which was highly consistent with histopathological results (Kappa=0.889).There was no statistically significant difference between AI diagnosis and manual diagnosis methods (χ²= 0.568, P=0.451). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of AI diagnosis were 91.8%, 92.3%, 91.8%, and 92.3%, respectively. There were 126 cytology sections, each of which required 6.67 minutes for manual diagnosis and 5.00 minutes for AI diagnosis.

Conclusion/Implications The AI image recognition system has high diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, which is equivalent to the manual diagnosis level of professional pathologists, and this system has application value in the diagnosis of benign and malignant endometrial cell clumps.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.