Article Text

Download PDFPDF

#870 Radiomic profiles improve prognostication and reveal targets for therapy in cervical cancer
Free
  1. Mari Kyllesø Halle1,2,
  2. Erlend Hodneland3,4,
  3. Kari S Wagner-Larsen5,6,
  4. Njål G Lura7,5,
  5. Kristine E Fasmer8,9,
  6. Hege F Berg4,10,
  7. Thomasz Stokowy7,5,
  8. Aashish Srivastava8,9,
  9. David Forsse4,10,
  10. Erling A Hoivik7,5,
  11. Kathrine Woie8,
  12. Bjørn I Bertelsen4,
  13. Camilla Krakstad7,5 and
  14. Ingfrid S Haldorsen8,2
  1. 1Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Bergen, Norway
  2. 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bergen, Norway
  3. 3Department of Clinical Science, Bergen, Norway
  4. 4Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
  5. 5University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  6. 6Department of Mathematics, Bergen, Norway
  7. 7Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Bergen, Norway
  8. 8Department of Radiology, Bergen, Norway
  9. 9Section of Radiology, Bergen, Norway
  10. 10Department of Clinical Medicine, Bergen, Norway
  11. 11Section of Radiology
  12. 12Department of Clinical Medicine

Abstract

Introduction/Background Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important part of primary diagnostic workup in cervical cancer (CC), with MRI-assessed tumour size and pelvic tumour extent routinely guiding treatment decisions. Extraction of MRI-derived radiomic tumour features could improve cancer prognostics and may also reveal novel targets for treatment.

Methodology We manually segmented 3D volumes in 132 primary CC tumours and extracted 293 whole-volume radiomic MRI features. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering yielded three distinct patient clusters (Cluster 1 [n=52]; 2 [n=46]; and 3 [n=34]). Overlapping clinicopathologic, genomic (whole exome sequencing, n=65), transcriptomic (L1000 arrays, n=73) and molecular biomarker (n=84) data were utilized to characterize each cluster.

Results Patients in Cluster 2 and 3 had significantly reduced disease-specific survival (DSS) (hazard rate [HR]: 3.33; p=0.008) compared with patients in Clusters 1, even after adjusting for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage and age (adjusted HR: 2.51; p=0.045). Cluster 3 tumours associate with high stage (p<0.001), large tumours (p<0.001), squamous histology (p=0.015), p53 negative or -overexpressing tumours (p=0.04) and aberrant TP53, -MYC and -MTORC1 signalling. The intermediate-risk Cluster 2 associates with increased and aberrant cell cycle- and Hippo signalling, suggesting CDK2/4 and YAP-TEAD inhibitors as plausible treatment options. The low-risk Cluster 1 associates with increased immune cell signalling.

Conclusion This study links radiomic signatures to distinct genomic profiles that may potentially aid in prognostication and tailoring of treatments and follow-up plans for cervical cancer patients.

Disclosures The authors declare no conflict interests.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.