Article Text

Download PDFPDF

#623 How to prevent dual modality treatment in early-stage cervical cancer???
Free
  1. Richa Kaushik,
  2. Jaydip Bhaumik,
  3. Anik Ghosh,
  4. Basumita Chakraborti,
  5. Jagannath Mishra and
  6. Subhashree Rout
  1. Tata Medical center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Abstract

Introduction/Background Dual modality treatment in cervical cancer is associated with increased morbidity. This study was conducted to understand the surgical-pathological factors associated with adjuvant treatment, following RH (Radical Hysterectomy), in early-stage cervical cancer (ESCC).

Methodology Single centre retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care cancer centre in India. ESCC patients, who underwent primary surgical treatment between 2011 and 2022, were included.

Results 64 ESCC patients underwent RH. Total 32(50%) patients needed adjuvant treatment; 13(20.3%) due to one or more high risk factors (HRF) positivity, received concurrent chemo-radiotherapy; 17(26.6%) due to intermediate risk factors (IRF) positivity, received adjuvant RT (Radiotherapy) and 2 patients with final histology of NET (Neuro-Endocrine Tumour) were given adjuvant CT (Chemotherapy). Total 28(46.7%) patients had IRF, as 11 patients, who were positive for HRF, were also positive for IRF. Among patients who had HRF; 11 had LN (Lymph Node) positivity, 3 had parametrium positivity and 4 had margin positivity. We started routine frozen evaluation of LN from September, 2019, and those who had negative frozen LN frozen were proceeded with RH. For a total of 31 ESCC patients, intra-operative frozen LN assessment was done and was found negative in 20 patients. All frozen negative LN were also negative in final pathology. 11 (17% of total cohort) patients underwent pre-operative electro surgical DEP (Diagnostic Excision Procedure) and among them only one (9.9% of 11) had positive IRF in final pathology. In cohort of diagnostic punch biopsy, 27 (50.94% of 53) patients had positive IRF in final pathology. Difference in IRF positivity rates between DEP and punch biopsy groups was significant (p-0.026).

Conclusion Routine practice of pre-operative DEP to know IRF and pre-operative or intra-operative LN assessment by histological or frozen assessment respectively, can help to avoid dual modality of treatment in significant number of ESCC patients.

Disclosures No conflict of interests

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.