Article Text

Download PDFPDF

#566 Update on longterm follow up in patients with cervical cancer that underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator
Free
  1. Dimitrios Zygouris,
  2. Antonis Gkoutzioulis,
  3. Ourania Kaiafa,
  4. Panagiotis Papandreou,
  5. Sofia Papadimitriou,
  6. Evgenia Stergiannakou and
  7. Andreas Kavallaris
  1. St Luke’s Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

Abstract

Introduction/Background The aim of this study is to evaluate surgical data and oncological outcome of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB, over the last 12 years.

Methodology This retrospective study includes 44 patients with cervical cancer Figo stage (2009) IB who underwent laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without using any kind of uterine manipulator. Patients were eligible if they had squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adeno-squamous carcinoma, and no para-aortic lymph node involvement by imaging or after frozen section. The median value and range were assessed for operative outcomes and relapse rate and disease-free survival rate were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results In the study, 44 patients were included and among them 35 women were stage IB1 (23 cases with tumor size 2–4 cm) and 8 women stage IB2 (Figo stage 2009). T The average operating time was 221 min and median hospital stay was 2.6 days . Approximate blood loss was 181 ml (range 120–300 ml). After a median follow-up of 62 months, we had 2 recurrences out of 44 cases and no death. Especially for patients with Figo stage (2009) IB1, the recurrence rate was 3.1% (1/32). The 3-year PFS was 96.1% and the number at risk 26 (71.8%) and especially for the IB1 stage (2009) women, the 3-year PFS was 96.9% and the number at risk 21 (77.7%). The 3-year OS was 100% with no. at risk 71.8%.

Conclusion Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator is feasible and safe surgical procedure for cervical cancer with acceptable surgical and oncological outcomes in the hands of well-trained and experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Our retrospective study reveals better oncological outcome compared to other studies on the minimally invasive approach, where uterine manipulator was routinely used and no vaginal sealing of the tumor was made.

Disclosures All authors declare no conflict of interest

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.