You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 33, Issue Suppl 3
  • #461 Patient reported outcomes from CCTG CX.5 (SHAPE): randomized trial comparing radical hysterectomy (RH) and pelvic node dissection (PND) vs simple hysterectomy (SH) and PND in women with low-risk early-stage

Article info

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Oral Sessions
10. Quality of life after treatment
#461 Patient reported outcomes from CCTG CX.5 (SHAPE): randomized trial comparing radical hysterectomy (RH) and pelvic node dissection (PND) vs simple hysterectomy (SH) and PND in women with low-risk early-stage
Free

Authors

Citation

Ferguson S, Plante M, Tu D, et al
#461 Patient reported outcomes from CCTG CX.5 (SHAPE): randomized trial comparing radical hysterectomy (RH) and pelvic node dissection (PND) vs simple hysterectomy (SH) and PND in women with low-risk early-stage
International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 2023;33:A30-A31.

Publication history

  • First published September 27, 2023.
Online issue publication 
September 28, 2023

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© IGCS and ESGO 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.