You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 33, Issue Suppl 3
  • #461 Patient reported outcomes from CCTG CX.5 (SHAPE): randomized trial comparing radical hysterectomy (RH) and pelvic node dissection (PND) vs simple hysterectomy (SH) and PND in women with low-risk early-stage

Citation Tools

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Oral Sessions
10. Quality of life after treatment
#461 Patient reported outcomes from CCTG CX.5 (SHAPE): randomized trial comparing radical hysterectomy (RH) and pelvic node dissection (PND) vs simple hysterectomy (SH) and PND in women with low-risk early-stage
Free

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:
Ferguson S, Plante M, Tu D, et al
#461 Patient reported outcomes from CCTG CX.5 (SHAPE): randomized trial comparing radical hysterectomy (RH) and pelvic node dissection (PND) vs simple hysterectomy (SH) and PND in women with low-risk early-stage
International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 2023;33:A30-A31.