Article Text
Abstract
Introduction/Background Sentinel lymph node mapping (SLN) for endometrial (EC) and cervical cancer (CC) is routinely performed worldwide. However, it has not yet been integrated into practice universally. Early career gynaecologic oncologists training practices in SLN mapping were assessed in a global survey.
Methodology An anonymous questionnaire containing 53 questions was distributed via email to the ESGO-ENYGO and IGCS member database. Respondents who were younger than 40 years of age (early career gynaecologic oncologists) were included in this descriptive analysis.
Results 238 respondents from 58 countries took part in the survey: 103 (43%) certified gynaecologic oncologists, 69 (29%) subspeciality trainees/fellows, 18 (8%) residents, while 48 (20%) did not mention their level of training. Responses differed for EC and CC (p<0.001): 8% stated that no SLN for EC is performed at their institution, while for CC it was 15%. Only 32% (n=77) perform SLN mapping for all eligible cases in EC and 16% in CC (n=38). A SLN surgical algorithm was reported by 59% of respondents for EC and by 47% for CC. Fifty-five percent of respondents were initially trained in systematic lymph node dissection (LND), 33% in SLN mapping and 12% were not trained in either SLN mapping or systematic LND. When assessing which steps of SLN mapping are usually performed (136 responses): 89% (n=121) reported injecting the tracer, 90% (n=122) inspect the pelvic area, 85% (n=115) dissect anatomic landmarks and identify the SLN, and 83% (n=113) perform the dissection of the SLN. Poor access to training was the main challenge reported by 96% (n=229) and 84% (n= 199) reported to be predominantly self-taught.
Conclusion A total of 8–15% of respondents stated not to perform SLN procedure at their institution and 12% were not trained in any lymph node surgery. SLN mapping in EC was reported to be used more routinely than for CC.
Disclosures COI submitted where applicable.