Article Text

Download PDFPDF

#697 Improving the sentinel node itself. one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) of sentinel lymph node in early-stage endometrial cancer: spanish multicenter study (ENDO-OSNA)
  1. María Alonso-Espías1,
  2. María Dolores Diestro1,
  3. Alberto Berjon1,
  4. Ignacio Zapardiel1,
  5. Laura Yébenes1,
  6. Irene Ruiz2,
  7. Arantza Lekuona2,
  8. Marta Rezola2,
  9. Ibon Jaunarena2,
  10. Jaime Siegrist1,
  11. Margarita Sánchez-Pastor1,
  12. María Cuadra3,
  13. Amaia Sagasta3,
  14. Isabel Guerra3,
  15. Luis Ignacio Lete3,
  16. Fernando Roldán4,
  17. Carlo Bruno Marta4,
  18. María José Boillos4,
  19. Alicia Hernández1 and
  20. David Hardisson1
  1. 1La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
  2. 2Donostia Osakidetza University Hospital, Donostia, Spain
  3. 3Instituto de Investigación Bioaraba, OSI Araba Univerity Hospital, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
  4. 4Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain


Introduction/Background One-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) is an automated molecular diagnostic assay used to detect metastases by analyzing the levels of cytokeratin 19 mRNA in whole lymph nodes. It has been validated as an accurate and reliable tool for staging in several types of cancers and is included in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for the management of breast cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of OSNA for the detection of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis compared to standard pathological ultrastaging in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC).

Methodology A total of 526 SLNs from 191 patients with EC were included in the study, and 379 SLNs (147 patients) were evaluated by both methods, OSNA and standard pathological ultrastaging. The central 1 mm portion of each lymph node was subjected to semi-serial sectioning at 200  m intervals and examined by hematoxylin–eosin and immunohistochemistry with CK19; the remaining tissue was analyzed by OSNA for CK19 mRNA.

Results The OSNA assay detected metastases in 19.7% of patients (14.9% micrometastasis and 4.8% macrometastasis), whereas pathological ultrastaging detected metastasis in 8.8% of patients (3.4% micrometastasis and 5.4% macrometastasis). Using the established cut-off value for detecting SLN metastasis by OSNA in EC (250 copies/L), the sensitivity of the OSNA assay was 92%, specificity was 82%, diagnostic accuracy was 83%, and the negative predictive value was 99%. Discordant results between both methods were recorded in 20 patients (13.6%). OSNA resulted in an upstaging in 12 patients (8.2%).

Conclusion OSNA provides fast and reliable results and has already been successfully incorporated in the standard treatment guidelines for other tumors. In EC, the OSNA method shows higher sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy in the detection of SLN metastasis, including low-volume metastasis, compared to pathological ultrastaging.

Disclosures The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding this study.

ENDO-OSNA was funded by a grant from Sysmex España S.L.

The funder had no role in the design of the study; in the analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results; but provided support for data collection.

ROC curve showing the OSNA assay vs. pathological ultrastaging for the detection of SLN metastasis in endometrial cancer.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.