Article Text
Abstract
Introduction/Background In FIGO stages IB1-IB2 and IIA1 cervical cancer with suspected cervical stromal ring disruption on preoperative evaluation, radical surgery is indicated even though there is an increased risk of adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT). While exclusive CCRT represents the gold standard for FIGO stages IB3/IIA2, subgroup analysis restricted to these stages of studies comparing CCRT vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) showed similar outcomes between the two groups. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the role of dose-dense NACT with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with FIGO stage IB1-IB2/IIA1 with preoperative stromal ring disruption or IB3-IIA2.
Methodology Patients with FIGO stages IB1-IIA2 undergoing dose-dense NACT at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan from 07/2014 to 12/2022 were retrospectively identified. They received weekly dose-dense carboplatin + paclitaxel for 6–9 cycles followed by radical surgery or CCRT, depending on radiologic response as assessed by RECIST criteria. Predictors of radiologic response to NACT and follow-up data were evaluated with appropriate statistical analysis.
Results A total of 64 patients meeting inclusion criteria were included. Radiological response to NACT were the following: 10(15,6%) complete response, 41(64,0%) partial response, 11(17,0%) stable disease, and 2(3,1%) progressive disease. None of the evaluated factors were associated with radiological response to NACT (table 1). After multidisciplinary team discussion, 6 (9,4%) patients were deemed inoperable and received CCRT. Among the remaining 58 (90,6%) patients undergoing surgery, 14 (24,1%) underwent CCRT, 2 (3,4%) radiotherapy alone, and 7 (12,1%) chemotherapy alone, while the remaining 35 (60,3%) were observed. Overall, NACT followed by surgery allowed us to avoid radiotherapy in 42 (65.6%) patients. Among them, during a median follow-up time of 52 months (range 6–94), 5 (11,3%) patients experienced a recurrence.
Conclusion Dose-dense NACT achieved a good response rate and could be considered an alternative approach, especially in young patients desiring to avoid radiotherapy.
Disclosures No conflict of interest for all the authors