Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Fertility sparing therapy in women with lymph node negative cervical cancer >2cm – oncologic and fertility outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical vaginal trachelectomy
  1. Andrea Plaikner1,
  2. Kathrin Siegler1,
  3. Hermann Hertel2,
  4. Anna Jacob3,
  5. Anja Petzel4,
  6. Melanie Schubert5,
  7. Jens-Uwe Blohmer6,
  8. Gerd Böhmer7,
  9. Simone Marnitz8,
  10. Volker Ragosch9,
  11. Christian Domröse10,
  12. Peter Oppelt11,
  13. Anne Jülicher12,
  14. Achim Schneider12,
  15. Anne Willems13,
  16. Giovanni Favero14 and
  17. Christhardt Köhler1,12,15
  1. 1 Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynecology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
  2. 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany
  3. 3 Department of Gynecology, Asklepios Clinic Wandsbek, Hamburg, Germany
  4. 4 Institute for Dysplasia and Cytology, MVZ Kreuzberg, Berlin, Germany
  5. 5 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
  6. 6 Charité University Medicine, Department of Gynecology, Charité, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
  7. 7 Institute for Dysplasia and Cytology, IZD Hannover, Hannover, Germany
  8. 8 Department of Radiooncology, Radiation Oncology Vosspalais, Private Clinic, Berlin, Germany, Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  9. 9 Department of Obstetrics, Asklepios Clinic Altona, Hamburg, Germany
  10. 10 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Köln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
  11. 11 Department for Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Endocrinology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
  12. 12 Institute for Dysplasia and Cytology, MVZ Fürstenbergkarree, Berlin, Germany
  13. 13 Institute for Dysplasia and Cytology, MVZ Köpenick, Germany
  14. 14 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Asklepios Hospital Lich, Lich, Germany
  15. 15 Department of Gynecology, German Red Cross Clinic Berlin Westend, Berlin, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Dr Andrea Plaikner, Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynecology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; an.plaikner{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Objective Simple or radical trachelectomy are accepted fertility sparing therapies for patients diagnosed with cervical cancer ≤2 cm. In patients with larger tumors a fertility sparing concept is considered experimental. The aim of our study is to present oncological and fertility outcomes of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent radical vaginal trachelectomy. These procedures were performed in two centers in patients diagnosed with cervical cancer of diameter >2 cm.

Method We retrospectively analyzed the demographic, histological, fertility and follow-up data of all patients with cervical cancer assessed as stage IB2, IB3 or IIA1 under the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 system. These patients had undergone pelvic lymphadenectomy, followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical vaginal trachelectomy between February 2006 and June 2020 at Charité University Berlin and Asklepios Hospital, Hamburg.

Results A total of 31 patients (mean age 29.5 years, range; 26–40) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical vaginal trachelectomy in case of proven tumor-free lymph nodes. Twenty-six (84%) of these patients were nulliparous. Across all 31 patients, the initial tumor stages were FIGO 2018 stage IB2 (n=27), IB3 (n=3) and IIA1 (n=1).

Lymphadenectomy was completed in all but one patient (sentinel) with a median of 33 (range; 11–47) pelvic lymph nodes. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen was two cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin in 17 patients; three cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin in eight patients; two cycles of paclitaxel and cisplatin in four patients; two cylces cisplatin monoagent in one patient; and two cycles of paclitaxel and cisplatin followed by two cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin in one patient. Residual tumor was histologically confirmed in 17 specimens (55%). The median residual tumor size following neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 12 mm (range; 1–60). Fertility could be preserved in 27 patients (87%); two patients underwent adjuvant chemoradiation after radical vaginal trachelectomy due to high-risk histological features; two other patients underwent radical hysterectomy with adjuvant chemoradiation therapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of 18 (67%) patients seeking motherhood, 13 became pregnant (72%). There were 12 live births in 10 women, with a median fetal weight of 2490 grams (range; 1640–3560) and five miscarriages. After a median follow-up of 94.5 months (range; 6–183) three recurrences (11.1%) were detected, one patient (3.7%) died of the disease.

Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical vaginal trachelectomy may be offered to patients seeking motherhood with cervical cancer >2 cm and histopathologically tumor-free lymph nodes, the rate of healthy baby pregnancy on discharge was 10/18 women (55%). This fertility-preserving strategy is associated with higher recurrence and death compared with what was published in the literature for women undergoing radical vaginal trachelectomy for tumors up to 2 cm.

  • Surgical Oncology
  • Cervix Uteri

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • AP and KS are joint first authors.

  • Contributors All authors have substantially contributed to the development of the technique, the design and writing of the manuscript and data collection. AP accepts full responsibility for the work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish as a guarantor.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.