Article Text

Download PDFPDF

2022-RA-727-ESGO Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in a Portuguese population
Free
  1. André Borges1,2,
  2. Patricia Pinto3,
  3. Paula Ambrósio3,
  4. Raquel Condeço3,
  5. Ana Martins1,
  6. Rita Passarinho4,
  7. Maria José Bernardo3 and
  8. Dusan Djokovic3,5,6
  1. 1Obstetric and Gynecology, CHLO, Lisbon, Portugal
  2. 2Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
  3. 3Gynecology and Obstetrics (MAC), CHULC, Lisboa, Portugal
  4. 4Obstetrics and Gynecology, HVFX, Vila Franca de Xira, Portugal
  5. 5NOVA Medical School, NOVA Univeristy of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
  6. 6Hospital CUF Descobertas, Lisbon, Portugal

Abstract

Introduction/Background The Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) risk model was developed by clinicians and statisticians from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group to assist the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in patients who have at least one persistent adnexal tumor and are considered to require surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ADNEX model in 3 Portuguese tertiary referral centers.

Methodology The study was conducted between January 2016 and December 2020 and included consecutive non-pregnant ≥18-year-old patients with adnexal masses diagnosed at our units and submitted to surgery within 6 months after the ultrasound diagnosis. All scans were performed by IOTA-certified sonologists. The lesions were prospectively classified using the ADNEX model malignancy risk threshold set at ≥ 10%. By using the histological classification as the main outcome measure, the ADNEX sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were determined for malignant adnexa pathology and its subtypes.

Results This multicenter analysis involved 449 patients – 345 with benign and 104 with malignant lesions (35 borderline ovarian tumors [BOT], 25 stage I, 37 stage II – IV primary ovarian cancer and 7 secondary metastatic cancer to the ovary). Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the ADNEX model (with known CA-125 level in all cases) are shown in the accompanying table for global adnexal malignancy and specific subtypes. Regarding the frequent misclassified lesions, cystadenoma and cystadenofibroma were the most common histological entities misinterpreted as BOT (39/56), while 5/10 misinterpreted BOTs were considered invasive malignancies and another 5/10 benign lesions. Only 2/8 metastatic lesions were correctly classified.

Abstract 2022-RA-727-ESGO Table 1

Performance of the IOTA ADNEX model in a Portuguese population

Conclusion According to our data, the ADNEX performance in the Portuguese population is similar to that in previously studied populations. It discriminates well between benign and malignant tumors and offers fair to good discrimination between four subtypes of ovarian malignancy.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.